Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881973›Full record

ReviewPlant cell reports2018

Camelina sativa, an oilseed at the nexus between model system and commercial crop.

Meghna R Malik, Jihong Tang, Nirmala Sharma, Claire Burkitt, Yuanyuan Ji, Marie Mykytyshyn, Karen Bohmert-Tatarev, Oliver Peoples, Kristi D Snell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant cell reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeted engineering of camelina and pennycress seeds for ultrahigh accumulation of acetyl-TAG.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Realizing the Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meghna R MalikMetabolix Oilseeds, Inc., 110 Gymnasium Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W9, Canada.
Jihong TangYield10 Bioscience, Inc., 19 Presidential Way, Woburn, MA, 01801, USA.
Nirmala SharmaMetabolix Oilseeds, Inc., 110 Gymnasium Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W9, Canada.
Claire BurkittMetabolix Oilseeds, Inc., 110 Gymnasium Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W9, Canada.
Yuanyuan JiMetabolix Oilseeds, Inc., 110 Gymnasium Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W9, Canada.
Marie MykytyshynMetabolix Oilseeds, Inc., 110 Gymnasium Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W9, Canada.
Karen Bohmert-TatarevYield10 Bioscience, Inc., 19 Presidential Way, Woburn, MA, 01801, USA.
Oliver PeoplesYield10 Bioscience, Inc., 19 Presidential Way, Woburn, MA, 01801, USA.
Kristi D SnellYield10 Bioscience, Inc., 19 Presidential Way, Woburn, MA, 01801, USA. snell@yield10bio.com.

Funding

Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy DE-FOA-0000470Bioenergy Technologies Office DE-EE0007003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid assessment of metabolic engineering strategies in plants is aided by crops that provide simple, high throughput transformation systems, a sequenced genome, and the ability to evaluate the resulting plants in field trials. Camelina sativa provides all of these attributes in a robust oilseed platform. The ability to perform field evaluation of Camelina is a useful, and in some studies essential benefit that allows researchers to evaluate how traits perform outside the strictly controlled conditions of a greenhouse. In the field the plants are subjected to higher light intensities, seasonal diurnal variations in temperature and light, competition for nutrients, and watering regimes dictated by natural weather patterns, all which may affect trait performance. There are difficulties associated with the use of Camelina. The current genetic resources available for Camelina pale in comparison to those developed for the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana; however, the sequence similarity of the Arabidopsis and Camelina genomes often allows the use of Arabidopsis as a reference when additional information is needed. Camelina's genome, an allohexaploid, is more complex than other model crops, but the diploid inheritance of its three subgenomes is straightforward. The need to navigate three copies of each gene in genome editing or mutagenesis experiments adds some complexity but also provides advantages for gene dosage experiments. The ability to quickly engineer Camelina with novel traits, advance generations, and bulk up homozygous lines for small-scale field tests in less than a year, in our opinion, far outweighs the complexities associated with the crop.

Indexed as

Gene EditingMetabolic EngineeringArabidopsisBrassicaceaeCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantPlant BreedingPlant OilsPlants, Genetically ModifiedSeedsTransformation, GeneticPlant OilsCamelina sativaDoubled haploidField trialsGene editingMetabolic engineeringModel crop

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.