Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881951›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2019

Food-Related Contact Dermatitis, Contact Urticaria, and Atopy Patch Test with Food.

Alexandra Walter, Marlene Seegräber, Andreas Wollenberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Contact Urticaria Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review.Current dermatology reports · 2022
    Review
  7. Contact Dermatitis: Classifications and Management.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Controversies in Allergy: Food Testing and Dietary Avoidance in Atopic Dermatitis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra WalterDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Marlene SeegräberDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Andreas WollenbergDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany. wollenberg@lrz.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide variety of foods may cause or aggravate skin diseases such as contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, or atopic dermatitis (AD), both in occupational and private settings. The mechanism of action underlying allergic disease to food, food additives, and spices may be immunologic and non-immunologic. The classification and understanding of these reactions is a complex field, and knowledge of the possible reaction patterns and appropriate diagnostic test methods is essential. In addition, certain foods may cause worsening of atopic dermatitis lesions in children. The atopy patch test (APT) is a well-established, clinically useful tool for assessing delayed type reactions to protein allergens in patients and may be useful to detect protein allergens relevant for certain skin diseases. The APT may even detect sensitization against allergens in intrinsic atopic dermatitis patients, who show negative skin prick test and negative in vitro IgE test results against these allergens. Native foods, SPT solutions on filter paper, and purified allergens in petrolatum have been used for APT. The European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) has worked on standardizing this test in the context of AD patients, who are allergic to aeroallergens and food. This recommended, standardized technique involves test application at the upper back of children and adults; use of large, 12-mm Finn chambers; avoidance of any pre-treatment such as tape stripping or delipidation; standardized amounts of purified allergens in petrolatum; and use of the standardized ETFAD reading key. The APT may not be the best working or best standardized of all possible skin tests, but it is the best test that we currently have available in this niche.

Indexed as

AllergensDermatitis, ContactDesensitization, ImmunologicDietary ProteinsFood HypersensitivityHumansImmunityImmunoglobulin ELightPatch TestsPhenotypeRisk FactorsUrticariaAllergensDietary ProteinsImmunoglobulin EAtopy patch testContact dermatitisContact urticariaFood allergyReading key

Identifiers

PMID29881951
OpenAlexW2806257748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.