ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2019
Food-Related Contact Dermatitis, Contact Urticaria, and Atopy Patch Test with Food.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contact Urticaria and Related Conditions: Clinical Review.Contact dermatitis · 2025Review
- Is Food-Triggered Atopic Dermatitis a Form of Systemic Contact Dermatitis?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2024Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of atopy patch test in children with cow's milk allergy.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2023Article
- Atopic Dermatitis and Food Allergy: A Complex Interplay What We Know and What We Would Like to Learn.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Immunological Pathomechanisms of Spongiotic Dermatitis in Skin Lesions of Atopic Dermatitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Contact Urticaria Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review.Current dermatology reports · 2022Review
- Contact Dermatitis: Classifications and Management.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021Review
- A spotlight on lime: a review about adverse reactions and clinical manifestations due to Citrus aurantiifolia.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2021Review
- Controversies in Allergy: Food Testing and Dietary Avoidance in Atopic Dermatitis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2019Review
- Exploring the Landscape of Food Allergies in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
- Hand Dermatitis Secondary to Exposure to Butternut Squash.Case reports in dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wide variety of foods may cause or aggravate skin diseases such as contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, or atopic dermatitis (AD), both in occupational and private settings. The mechanism of action underlying allergic disease to food, food additives, and spices may be immunologic and non-immunologic. The classification and understanding of these reactions is a complex field, and knowledge of the possible reaction patterns and appropriate diagnostic test methods is essential. In addition, certain foods may cause worsening of atopic dermatitis lesions in children. The atopy patch test (APT) is a well-established, clinically useful tool for assessing delayed type reactions to protein allergens in patients and may be useful to detect protein allergens relevant for certain skin diseases. The APT may even detect sensitization against allergens in intrinsic atopic dermatitis patients, who show negative skin prick test and negative in vitro IgE test results against these allergens. Native foods, SPT solutions on filter paper, and purified allergens in petrolatum have been used for APT. The European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) has worked on standardizing this test in the context of AD patients, who are allergic to aeroallergens and food. This recommended, standardized technique involves test application at the upper back of children and adults; use of large, 12-mm Finn chambers; avoidance of any pre-treatment such as tape stripping or delipidation; standardized amounts of purified allergens in petrolatum; and use of the standardized ETFAD reading key. The APT may not be the best working or best standardized of all possible skin tests, but it is the best test that we currently have available in this niche.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.