Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881936›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2019

Prevalence of dry eye in video display terminal users: a cross-sectional Caucasian study in Italy.

Gemma Caterina Maria Rossi, Luigia Scudeller, Federica Bettio, Gian Maria Pasinetti, Paolo Emilio Bianchi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07679685 (A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Perfluorohexyloctane Eye Drops Versus 0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops in the Treatment of Video Display Terminal-associated Dry Eye), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07679685 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Perfluorohexyloctane Eye Drops Versus 0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops in the Treatment of Video Display Terminal-associated Dry Eye

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tongren HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled159ConditionsDry EyeArms0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops, Perfluorohexyloctane Eye Drops (PFHO)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gemma Caterina Maria RossiUniversity Eye Clinic of Pavia, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. g.rossi@smatteo.pv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-2420
Luigia ScudellerScientific Direction, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Federica BettioUniversity Eye Clinic of Pavia, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Gian Maria PasinettiOculistica, Istituto Beato Palazzolo, Bergamo, Italy.
Paolo Emilio BianchiUniversity Eye Clinic of Pavia, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo estimate the prevalence of dry eye among video-terminal (VDT) users and to assess risk factors for dry eye in this population. STUDY

designA single-centre, cross-sectional study was carried out on subjects employed as VDT workers and on a control group.

methodsDemographic data, years spent working at a VDT, number of effective hours at VDT/day, number and hours of breaks/day were considered. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and completed the Italian version of the computer vision symptom scale 17-item (CVSS17) questionnaire. Both groups were classified as definite, suspect and non-dry eye syndrome (DES).

resultsOne-hundred and ninety four subjects completed the study; 70 (36.1%) of which represented the control group, and 124 (63.9%) represented the VDT group. Among VDT workers, 29 (23.4%) presented definite DES and 55 (44.4%) suspect DES, while among controls, only 2 (2.9%) presented definite DES and 37 (52.8%) suspect DES. In the univariate analysis, the DES group was older (p < 0.001), spent more time a day at VDT (p < 0.001), used VDT from more time (p < 0.001), instilled artificial tears (p = 0.031), and presented worst quality of life (p < 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, only age and time at VDT retained association with DES (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.01 and OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.07-2.02; p = 0.017, respectively).

conclusionsThe global increase of VDT workers is accompanied by a higher frequency of ocular complaints. Older subjects and people spending more than 4 h a day at VDT are at major risk to develop DES and should take precautions to prevent the onset of the disease.

Indexed as

Computer TerminalsAdultCase-Control StudiesCorneaCross-Sectional StudiesDry Eye SyndromesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesPrevalenceQuality of LifeRisk FactorsTearsDry eyeOccupational healthOcular surfacePrevalenceQuality of lifeVideo display terminal (VDT)

Identifiers

PMID29881936
OpenAlexW2807400328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.