ArticleEpilepsia open2018
Epilepsy as a dynamic disease: A Bayesian model for differentiating seizure risk from natural variability.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- L-Relationship between uncertainty and average seizure frequency in clinical trials of antiseizure medications.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- State-dependent effects of responsive neurostimulation depend on seizure localization.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Factors associated with placebo response rate in randomized controlled trials of antiseizure medications for focal epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- State Space Modeling of Event Count Time Series.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- BAYESIAN NON-HOMOGENEOUS HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL WITH VARIABLE SELECTION FOR INVESTIGATING DRIVERS OF SEIZURE RISK CYCLING.The annals of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Seizure count forecasting to aid diagnostic testing in epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2022Article
- A Bayesian switching linear dynamical system for estimating seizure chronotypes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Application of Machine Learning Methods for Epilepsy Risk Ranking in Patients with Hematopoietic Malignancies Using.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Epilepsy during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a US population survey.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2021Article
- Prediction of Seizure Recurrence. A Note of Caution.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Evaluation and recommendations for effective data visualization for seizure forecasting algorithms.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- Development and Validation of Forecasting Next Reported Seizure Using e-Diaries.Annals of neurology · 2020Article
- Prospective validation study of an epilepsy seizure risk system for outpatient evaluation.Epilepsia · 2020Article
- An interview with Sharon Chiang, 2019Epilepsia open · 2019Article
- Characteristics of large patient-reported outcomes: Where can one million seizures get us?Epilepsia open · 2018Article
- Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA fundamental challenge in treating epilepsy is that changes in observed seizure frequencies do not necessarily reflect changes in underlying seizure risk. Rather, changes in seizure frequency may occur due to probabilistic variation around an underlying seizure risk state caused by normal fluctuations from natural history, leading to seizure unpredictability and potentially suboptimal medication adjustments in epilepsy management. However, no rigorous statistical approach exists to systematically distinguish expected changes in seizure frequency due to natural variability from changes in underlying seizure risk.
methodsUsing data from SeizureTracker.com, a patient-reported seizure diary tool containing over 1.2 million recorded seizures across 8 years, a novel epilepsy seizure risk assessment tool (EpiSAT) employing a Bayesian mixed-effects hidden Markov model for zero-inflated count data was developed to estimate changes in underlying seizure risk using patient-reported seizure diary and clinical measurement data. Accuracy for correctly assessing underlying seizure risk was evaluated through a simulation comparison. Implications for the natural history of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) were assessed using data from SeizureTracker.com.
resultsEpiSAT led to significant improvement in seizure risk assessment compared to traditional approaches relying solely on observed seizure frequencies. Applied to TSC, four underlying seizure risk states were identified. The expected duration of each state was <12 months, providing a data-driven estimate of the amount of time a person with TSC would be expected to remain at the same seizure risk level according to the natural course of epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: We propose a novel Bayesian statistical approach for evaluating seizure risk on an individual patient level using patient-reported seizure diaries, which allows for the incorporation of external clinical variables to assess impact on seizure risk. This tool may improve the ability to distinguish true changes in seizure risk from natural variations in seizure frequency in clinical practice. Incorporation of systematic statistical approaches into antiepileptic drug (AED) management may help improve understanding of seizure unpredictability as well as timing of treatment interventions for people with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.