Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881802›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2018

Epilepsy as a dynamic disease: A Bayesian model for differentiating seizure risk from natural variability.

Sharon Chiang, Marina Vannucci, Daniel M Goldenholz, Robert Moss, John M Stern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. State Space Modeling of Event Count Time Series.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Bayesian switching linear dynamical system for estimating seizure chronotypes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Epilepsy during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a US population survey.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon ChiangSchool of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas U.S.A.
Marina VannucciDepartment of Statistics Rice University Houston Texas U.S.A.
Daniel M GoldenholzDivision of Epilepsy Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-2758
Robert MossSeizureTracker.com Alexandria Virginia U.S.A.
John M SternDepartment of Neurology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California U.S.A.
Baylor College of Medicine · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USPfizer (United States) · USRice University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Training Program in Biostatistics for Cancer ResearchT32CA096520 · NCI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI KIMMEL, MAREK, YUAN, YING · 2003 to 2023
$4.5M
Simutaneous fMRI and EEG of Epileptogenic Brain RegionsK23NS044936 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI STERN, JOHN M · 2004 to 2008
$807k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS044936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA fundamental challenge in treating epilepsy is that changes in observed seizure frequencies do not necessarily reflect changes in underlying seizure risk. Rather, changes in seizure frequency may occur due to probabilistic variation around an underlying seizure risk state caused by normal fluctuations from natural history, leading to seizure unpredictability and potentially suboptimal medication adjustments in epilepsy management. However, no rigorous statistical approach exists to systematically distinguish expected changes in seizure frequency due to natural variability from changes in underlying seizure risk.

methodsUsing data from SeizureTracker.com, a patient-reported seizure diary tool containing over 1.2 million recorded seizures across 8 years, a novel epilepsy seizure risk assessment tool (EpiSAT) employing a Bayesian mixed-effects hidden Markov model for zero-inflated count data was developed to estimate changes in underlying seizure risk using patient-reported seizure diary and clinical measurement data. Accuracy for correctly assessing underlying seizure risk was evaluated through a simulation comparison. Implications for the natural history of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) were assessed using data from SeizureTracker.com.

resultsEpiSAT led to significant improvement in seizure risk assessment compared to traditional approaches relying solely on observed seizure frequencies. Applied to TSC, four underlying seizure risk states were identified. The expected duration of each state was <12 months, providing a data-driven estimate of the amount of time a person with TSC would be expected to remain at the same seizure risk level according to the natural course of epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: We propose a novel Bayesian statistical approach for evaluating seizure risk on an individual patient level using patient-reported seizure diaries, which allows for the incorporation of external clinical variables to assess impact on seizure risk. This tool may improve the ability to distinguish true changes in seizure risk from natural variations in seizure frequency in clinical practice. Incorporation of systematic statistical approaches into antiepileptic drug (AED) management may help improve understanding of seizure unpredictability as well as timing of treatment interventions for people with epilepsy.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferenceEpilepsyHidden Markov modelMixed effectsNatural historySeizure diary dataSeizure riskTuberous sclerosis complexZero‐inflated Poisson

Identifiers

PMID29881802
PMCPMC5983137
OpenAlexW2789815291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.