Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881649›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2018

Performance of Photoscreener in Detection of Refractive Error in All Age Groups and Amblyopia Risk Factors in Children in a Tribal District of Odisha: The Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) # 3.

Lapam Panda, Umasankar Barik, Suryasmita Nayak, Biswajit Barik, Gyanaranjan Behera, Ramesh Kekunnaya, Taraprasad Das

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retinoscopes: Past and present.World journal of methodology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Visual Screening with Welch Allyn Spot.Romanian journal of ophthalmology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lapam PandaIndian Oil Centre for Rural Eye Health, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Umasankar BarikNaraindas Morbai Budhrani Eye Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Rayagada, India.
Suryasmita NayakIndian Oil Centre for Rural Eye Health, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Biswajit BarikNaraindas Morbai Budhrani Eye Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Rayagada, India.
Gyanaranjan BeheraNaraindas Morbai Budhrani Eye Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Rayagada, India.
Ramesh KekunnayaJasti V Ramanamma Children's Eye Care Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Taraprasad DasIndian Oil Centre for Rural Eye Health, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate effectiveness of Welch Allyn Spot Vision Screener in detecting refractive error in all age groups and amblyopia risk factors in children in a tribal district of India.

methodsAll participants received dry retinoscopy and photorefraction; children also received cycloplegic retinoscopy. Statistical analysis included Bland-Altman and coefficient of determination (

resultsPhotoscreener could not elicit a response in 113 adults and 5 children of 580 recruited participants. In Bland-Altman analysis mean difference of Spot screener spherical equivalent (SSSE) and dry retinoscopy spherical equivalent (DRSE) was 0.32 diopters (D) in adults and 0.18 D in children; this was an overestimation of hyperopia and underestimation of myopia. In Bland-Altman analysis of SSSE and cycloplegic retinoscopy spherical equivalent (CRSE) the mean difference was -0.30 D in children; this was an overestimation of myopia and underestimation of hyperopia. In regression analysis the relationship between SSSE and DRSE was poor in adults (

conclusionsPhotoscreener has 87% accuracy in refraction in children. Its value could be used for subjective correction tests. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Photoscreening could complement traditional retinoscopy to address refractive error in children in a resource-limited facility region.

Indexed as

children's visionphotoscreenerrefraction

Identifiers

PMID29881649
PMCPMC5989763
OpenAlexW2807304393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.