Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881491›Full record

ReviewThe Pan African medical journal2017

Vacuum assisted closure technique: a short review.

Sankalp Yadav, Gautam Rawal, Mudit Baxi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Pan African medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05831020 (Method of Securing Skin Graft), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05831020 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Method of Securing Skin Graft: A Comparison of Vacuum Assisted Closure Device Versus Bolster Dressing

TypeinterventionalSponsorDow University of Health SciencesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled140ConditionsSkin Graft DetachmentArmsVAC and bolster dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sankalp YadavDepartment of Medicine & TB, Chest Clinic Moti Nagar, North Delhi Municipal Corporation, New Delhi, India.
Gautam RawalRespiratory Intensive Care, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
Mudit BaxiDepartment of Orthopedics, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Postgraduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of difficult to heal wounds has always been a cause of concern for the treating clinicians. There has been a tremendous increase in the number patients presenting with difficult to heal wounds. The conventional techniques have been in use since the long time for the management of these wounds, yet desired results are not achieved always. Thus a newer novel technique which might be useful in the difficult to heal wounds and delivering at par or better results as compared to the conventional techniques is the need of the hour.

Indexed as

VacuumHumansNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyTreatment OutcomeWound HealingNegative pressurenegative pressure wound deviceVACvacuum sealingvacuum therapywound closurewound healingwounds

Identifiers

PMID29881491
PMCPMC5989194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.