ArticleFrontiers in genetics2018
Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic and genetic analysis of energy partitioning and feed efficiency in Atlantic salmon.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Improvement in feed efficiency and reduction in nutrient loading from rainbow trout farms: the role of selective breeding.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Hematology parameters as potential indicators of feed efficiency in pigs.Translational animal science · 2021Article
- An investigation of links between metabolic rate and feed efficiency in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
- Targeting the Mild-Hypoxia Driving Force for Metabolic and Muscle Transcriptional Reprogramming of Gilthead Sea Bream (Biology · 2021Article
- Genomic and Phenotypic Agreement Defines the Use of Microwave Dielectric Spectroscopy for Recording Muscle Lipid Content in European Seabass (Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The genetic correlation between feed conversion ratio and growth rate affects the design of a breeding program for more sustainable fish production.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- Quantitative Genetics of Growth Rate and Filet Quality Traits in Atlantic Salmon Inferred From a Longitudinal Bayesian Model for the Left-Censored Gaussian Trait Growth Rate.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- The Effects of Feed Restriction and Isolated or Group Rearing on the Measurement of Individual Feed Intake and Estimation of Feed Conversion Ratio in Juvenile Nile Tilapia (Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Economic optimization of full-sib test group size and genotyping effort in a breeding program for Atlantic salmon.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
- Combining Individual Phenotypes of Feed Intake With Genomic Data to Improve Feed Efficiency in Sea Bass.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- First Evidence of Realized Selection Response on Fillet Yield in Rainbow TroutFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feed incurs most of the cost of aquaculture production, so feed efficiency (FE) improvement is of great importance. Our aim is to use work done in pigs to formulate a logical framework for assessing the most useful component traits influencing feed intake (FI) and efficiency in farmed fish - either to identify traits that can together be used for genetic improvement of FE, or as substitute traits for FI recording. Improvement of gross FE in growing fish can be accomplished by selection for increased growth rate. However, the correlation of growth with FE is typically only modest, and hence there is room for further improvement of FE through methods other than growth selection. Based on a literature review we propose that the most effective additional methods are selection for reduced body lipid content and for reduced residual FI (RFI). Both methods require more or less sophisticated recording equipment; in particular, the estimation of RFI requires recording of FI which is a challenge. In mammals and birds, both these approaches have been effective, and despite the high costs of FI recording, the RFI approach can be cost-efficient because maintenance requirements are high and therefore RFI variation covers a large part of FI variance. Maintenance requirements of fish are lower and therefore RFI variation covers a smaller part of FI variance. Moreover, accurate high-volume routine individual FI recording is much more challenging in fish than in mammals or birds. It follows that selection for reduced body fat content is likely a more effective (and certainly more cost-efficient) way to improve feed conversion ratio in fish than selection for reduced RFI. As long as body fat content is dealt with as an explicit selection criterion, the only valid reason for FI recording would be the requirement of RFI reduction. So, if RFI reduction is not required, there would be no need for the expense and effort of individual FI recording - and in fish breeding that would be a very desirable situation. Solid evidence for these propositions is still scarce, and their generality still needs to be confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.