Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881282›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2018

Surgical injury: comparing open surgery and laparoscopy by markers of tissue damage.

Jan Máca, Matúš Peteja, Petr Reimer, Ondřej Jor, Věra Šeděnková, Lucie Panáčková, Peter Ihnát, Michal Burda, Pavel Ševčík

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Exploratory Study of CD10Scandinavian journal of immunology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan MácaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Matúš PetejaThe Clinic of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Petr ReimerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Ondřej JorDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Věra ŠeděnkováDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Lucie PanáčkováDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Peter IhnátThe Clinic of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Michal BurdaInstitute for Research and Applications of Fuzzy Modeling, Centre of Excellence IT4Innovations, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Pavel ŠevčíkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor abdominal surgery (MAS) is high-risk intervention usually accompanied by tissue injury leading to a release of signaling danger molecules called alarmins. This study evaluates the surgical injury caused by two fundamental types of gastrointestinal surgical procedures (open surgery and laparoscopy) in relation to the inflammation elicited by alarmins. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients undergoing MAS were divided into a mixed laparoscopy group (LPS) and an open surgery group (LPT). Serum levels of alarmins (S100A8, S100A12, HMGB1, and HSP70) and biomarkers (leukocytes, C-reactive protein [CRP], and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) were analyzed between the groups. The secondary objectives were to compare LPT and LPS cancer subgroups and to find the relationship between procedure and outcome (intensive care unit length of stay [ICU-LOS] and hospital length of stay [H-LOS]).

resultsA total of 82 patients were analyzed. No significant difference was found in alarmin levels between the mixed LPS and LPT groups. IL-6 was higher in the LPS group on day 2 (

conclusionThe degree of surgical injury elicited by open MAS as reflected by alarmins is similar to that of laparoscopic procedures. Nevertheless, an early biomarker of inflammation (IL-6) was higher in the laparoscopy group, suggesting a greater inflammatory response. Moreover, the levels of S100A8 and S100A12 were higher with a longer ICU-LOS and H-LOS in the LPS cancer subgroup.

Indexed as

alarminsgastrointestinal surgerylaparoscopymajor surgeryopen surgerysurgical injury

Identifiers

PMID29881282
PMCPMC5985784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.