Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29881270›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2018

A polypropylene mesh modified with poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibers in hernia repair: large animal experiment.

Barbora East, Martin Plencner, Martin Kralovic, Michala Rampichova, Vera Sovkova, Karolina Vocetkova, Martin Otahal, Zbynek Tonar, Yaroslav Kolinko, Evzen Amler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biodegradable Polymers in Veterinary Medicine-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Liquid resorbable nanofibrous surgical mesh: a proof of a concept.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Barbora EastSecond Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin PlencnerInstitute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin KralovicSecond Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michala RampichovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vera SovkovaSecond Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karolina VocetkovaSecond Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin OtahalDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Education, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zbynek TonarDepartment of Histology and Embryology.
Yaroslav KolinkoDepartment of Histology and Embryology.
Evzen AmlerSecond Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiri HochSecond Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncisional hernia repair is an unsuccessful field of surgery, with long-term recurrence rates reaching up to 50% regardless of technique or mesh material used. Various implants and their positioning within the abdominal wall pose numerous long-term complications that are difficult to treat due to their permanent nature and the chronic foreign body reaction they trigger. Materials mimicking the 3D structure of the extracellular matrix promote cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Some electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds provide a topography of a natural extracellular matrix and are cost effective to manufacture. MATERIALS AND

methodsA composite scaffold that was assembled out of a standard polypropylene hernia mesh and poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanofibers was tested in a large animal model (minipig), and the final scar tissue was subjected to histological and biomechanical testing to verify our in vitro results published previously.

resultsWe have demonstrated that a layer of PCL nanofibers leads to tissue overgrowth and the formation of a thick fibrous plate around the implant. Collagen maturation is accelerated, and the final scar is more flexible and elastic than under a standard polypropylene mesh with less pronounced shrinkage observed. However, the samples with the composite scaffold were less resistant to distracting forces than when a standard mesh was used. We believe that the adverse effects could be caused due to the material assembly, as they do not comply with our previous results.

conclusionWe believe that PCL nanofibers on their own can cause enough fibroplasia to be used as a separate material without the polypropylene base, thus avoiding potential adverse effects caused by any added substances.

Indexed as

HerniaSurgical MeshAbdominal WallAnimalsCollagenDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHerniorrhaphyMaterials TestingMiceNanofibersPolyestersPolypropylenesSwineSwine, MiniatureTissue ScaffoldsCollagenpolycaprolactonePolyestersPolypropylenesbiomechanicalhernialarge animalmeshminipignanofibersPCL

Identifiers

PMID29881270
PMCPMC5978460
OpenAlexW2803684406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.