ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2018
The validity and reliability of the modified forgotten joint score.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Trial
- Early outcomes after robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.The bone & joint journal · 2021Trial
- Mid-term Survivorship Analysis of Personalized Kinematic Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Surgeon and Single-Centre Prospective Study Among the Indian Population.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures used following hip or knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A multi-phase approach for developing a conceptual model and preliminary content for patient-reported outcome measurement in TKA patients: from a Chinese perspective.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Forgotten joint score associated with prosthesis weight in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a prospective clinical study.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- The Joint Awareness Score: A Shortened, Simplified, Improved Alternative to the Forgotten Joint Score.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Clinical outcomes after using patient specific instrumentation: is it worth the effort? A minimum 5-year retrospective review of 298 PSI knees.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Short-Term Outcomes of Robotic Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An Indian Perspective.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Normative FJS-12 scores for the knee in an Asian population: a cross-sectional study.Knee surgery & related research · 2021Article
- Forgotten Joint Score Post Total Knee Arthroplasty and Its Correlation with the New Knee Society Score.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Article
- A bicentric approach evaluating the combination of a hemispheric cup with a novel ceramic head in total hip arthroplasty.Orthopedic reviews · 2021Article
- Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.Bone & joint research · 2021Article
- Article
- Translation and Validation of Forgotten Joint Score for Total Hip Arthroplasty for Indian Population.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Satisfaction after total knee replacement for osteoarthritis is usually high, but what are we measuring? A systematic review.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2020Review
- Does the medial pivot knee improve the clinical and radiographic outcome of total knee arthroplasty? A single centre study on two hundred and ninety seven patients.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- The Forgotten Joint Score-12 in Swedish patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a validation study with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) as comparator.Acta orthopaedica · 2020Article
- PCL-retaining versus PCL-substituting TKR - Outcome assessment based on the "forgotten joint score".Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2015Article
- The Forgotten Joint Score-12 in Anterior Cruciate Ligament injuries.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aim to validate the "Modified Forgotten Joint Score" (MFJS) as a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hip and knee arthroplasty, against the UK's gold standard Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS/OKS). The original Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (12 items) was created to assess post-arthroplasty joint awareness. We modified the FJS to 10-items to improve its reliability. Postal questionnaires were sent out to 400 total hip or knee replacement (THR/TKR) patients who were 1-2 years' post-op, along with the OHS/OKS. Data, collected from the 212 returned questionnaires (53% response rate), was analysed in relation to construct and content validity. A sub-cohort of 77 patients took part in a test-retest repeatability study, to assess reliability of the MFJS. The MFJS proved to have an increased discriminatory power in high-performing patients in comparison to the OHS and OKS. 30.8% of TKR patients (n = 131) scored highly (87.5% or more) in the OKS compared to just 7.69% in the MFJS TKR patients. The MFJS proved to have increased test-retest repeatability, based upon its intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.968 compared to the Oxford's 0.845, p < 0.001. The MFJS is a more relevant tool, compared to the FJS, with greater discrimination in the assessment of well performing hip and knee arthroplasties in comparison to the OHS/OKS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.