ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2018
High values of pelvic incidence: A possible risk factor for zigoapophyseal facet arthrosis in young.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between modic changes, disc degeneration, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch in a large population based cohort: the Wakayama spine study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- The Use of Venous Catheter and Irrigation with Povidone-Iodine 0.6% in Patients with Punctal and Proximal Canalicular Stenosis: Preliminary Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Intervertebral disc degeneration and osteoarthritis: a common molecular disease spectrum.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Review
- Current Reconstruction Options in Periprosthetic Fractures Around the Knee.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2021Review
- Impact of pelvic incidence on lumbar osteophyte formation and disc degeneration in middle-aged and elderly people in a prospective cross-sectional cohort.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In humans the acquisition of the bipedalism caused different structural changes to achieve the new functional demands. In particular, several changes have occurred in the spine and pelvis. In recent years the sagittal morphology of the spine and pelvis has become one of the most focused topics in spine research. The sample consists of 348 volunteers, with no history of low back pain, without any previous major trauma at the spine or at the pelvis. Aged between 20 and 29 years. The presence and severity of zygoapophyseal facet arthrosis were investigated in accordance with Pathria's classification (it considered four parameters: width of interarticular space, the presence of osteophytes, the presence of facet hypertrophy and presence of areas of bone erosion). Volunteers were divided into two group based on sagittal balance subtype classified by Roussouly in 2005. 98 volunteers (35.76%) belongs to group A (subtype I and II), and 176 volunteers (64.24%) belongs to group III and IV. The different weight distribution in the lumbar spine suggests that different subtype of sagittal balance could develop zygoapophyseal facet arthrosis more frequently. Considering the different Groups, a statistically significant difference was found: people belonging in group B (subtype III and IV), shows a prevalence of 36,36% compared with a prevalence of 24.5% for group A (subtype I and II).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.