Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29880892›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2018

Patient-centered practice in elderly myeloma patients: an overview and consensus from the European Myeloma Network (EMN).

Alessandra Larocca, Sandra Maria Dold, Sonja Zweegman, Evangelos Terpos, Ralph Wäsch, Mattia D'Agostino, Sophia Scheubeck, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Francesca Gay, Michele Cavo and 12 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06099912 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Individualized Dynamic Frailty-tailored Therapy (DynaFiT) in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: a Prospective and Multi-center Study

TypeobservationalSponsorFengYan JinRan2021 to 2029Enrolled131ConditionsMultiple Myeloma, Frailty
NCT06252792 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Multicenter, Open and Non-interference Observational Clinical Study of Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (Dara-PD) in the Treatment of Patients With First Relapse of Multiple Myeloma

TypeobservationalSponsorFengYan JinRan2023 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsMultiple Myeloma, First Relapse
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Minimal residual disease assessment and progress in multiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Alessandra LaroccaMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy. alelarocca@hotmail.com.
Sandra Maria DoldDepartment of Medicine I, Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sonja ZweegmanVU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Evangelos TerposNational and Kapodostrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ralph WäschDepartment of Medicine I, Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0813-3444
Mattia D'AgostinoMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Sophia ScheubeckDepartment of Medicine I, Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hartmut GoldschmidtMedizinische Klinik, Abteilung Innere Medizin V, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg und National Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Francesca GayMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Michele CavoSeràgnoli Institute of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Heinz Ludwig1st Medical Department and Oncology, Wilhelminenspital Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Christian StrakaHematology & Oncology, Klinikum Schwabing, Munich, Germany.
Sara BringhenMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Holger W AunerCentre for Haematology, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4040-0642
Jo CaersDepartment of Hematology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Martin GramatzkiDivision of Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunotherapy, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Massimo OffidaniClinica di Ematologia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Meletios A DimopoulosNational and Kapodostrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Hermann EinseleDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Mario BoccadoroMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Pieter SonneveldDepartment of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Monika EngelhardtDepartment of Medicine I, Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITUniversity of Freiburg · DENational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRCancer Center Amsterdam · NLCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEHeidelberg University · DEImperial College London · GBMünchen Klinik Schwabing · DEOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITRotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Bologna · ITWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is a disease typical of the elderly, and, because of the increase in life expectancy of the general population, its incidence is expected to grow in the future. Elderly patients represent a particular challenge due to their marked heterogeneity. Many new and highly effective drugs have been introduced in the last few years and results from clinical trials are promising. Besides the availability of novel agents, a careful evaluation of elderly patients showed to be a key factor for the success of therapy. A geriatric assessment is a valid strategy to better stratify patients. In particular, different scores are available today to appropriately assess elderly patients and define their fitness/frailty status. The choice of treatment-transplantation, triplets, doublets, or reduced-dose therapies including novel agents-should depend on the patient's fitness status (fit, intermediate-fit or frail). Second-generation novel agents have also been evaluated as salvage therapy in the elderly, and these new agents certainly represent a further step forward in the treatment armamentarium for elderly patients with multiple myeloma.

Indexed as

AgedEuropeGeriatric AssessmentHumansMultiple MyelomaPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID29880892
OpenAlexW2801322837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.