ArticleNature neuroscience2018
Publisher Correction: N
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurobiological mechanisms of 40-Hz stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: evidence, heterogeneity, and constraints.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Unraveling Neurodevelopment: Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Genetic Programs and Extrinsic Environmental Cues.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- R-loops' m6A modification and its roles in cancers.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- USP1/UAF1-Stabilized METTL3 Promotes Reactive Astrogliosis and Improves Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury through mThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Identification of NNeurosurgical review · 2021Article
- Epitranscriptomics in the Heart: a Focus on mCurrent heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Diverse molecular functions of mExperimental & molecular medicine · 2020Review
- FTO Knockout Causes Chromosome Instability and G2/M Arrest in Mouse GC-1 Cells.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum forN2018
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the version of this article initially published online, there were errors in URLs for www.southernbiotech.com, appearing in Methods sections "m6A dot-blot" and "Western blot analysis." The first two URLs should be https://www.southernbiotech.com/?catno=4030-05&type=Polyclonal#&panel1-1 and the third should be https://www.southernbiotech.com/?catno=6170-05&type=Polyclonal. In addition, some Methods URLs for bioz.com, www.abcam.com and www.sysy.com were printed correctly but not properly linked. The errors have been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of this article.
Identifiers
29880878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.