Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29880737›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Comparative Analysis of the Classification of Food Products in the Mexican Market According to Seven Different Nutrient Profiling Systems.

Alejandra Contreras-Manzano, Alejandra Jáuregui, Anabel Velasco-Bernal, Jorge Vargas-Meza, Juan A Rivera, Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo, Simón Barquera

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of the Nutritional Quality of Processed Foods in Honduras: Comparison of Three Nutrient Profiles.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alejandra Contreras-ManzanoCenter for Research on Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico;. alejandra.contreras@insp.mx (A.C.-M.). alejandra.contreras@insp.mx.
Alejandra JáureguiCenter for Research on Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico;. alejandra.contreras@insp.mx (A.C.-M.). alejandra.jauregui@insp.mx.ORCID 0000-0001-9158-2007
Anabel Velasco-BernalCenter for Research on Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico;. alejandra.contreras@insp.mx (A.C.-M.). anabel.velasco@insp.mx.
Jorge Vargas-MezaCenter for Research on Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico;. alejandra.contreras@insp.mx (A.C.-M.). jorge.vargas@insp.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-6099-2895
Juan A RiveraNational Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico. jrivera@insp.mx.
Lizbeth Tolentino-MayoCenter for Research on Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico;. alejandra.contreras@insp.mx (A.C.-M.). mltolentino@insp.mx.ORCID 0000-0003-2400-8675
Simón BarqueraCenter for Research on Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico;. alejandra.contreras@insp.mx (A.C.-M.). sbarquera@insp.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient profiling systems (NPS) are used around the world. In some countries, the food industry participates in the design of these systems. We aimed to compare the ability of various NPS to identify processed and ultra-processed Mexican products containing excessive amounts of critical nutrients. A sample of 2544 foods and beverages available in the Mexican market were classified as compliant and non-compliant according to seven NPS: the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) model, which served as our reference, the Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (NPSC), the Mexican Committee of Nutrition Experts (MCNE), the Health Star Rating (HSR), the Mexican Nutritional Seal (MNS), the Chilean Warning Octagons (CWO) 2016, 2018 and 2019 criteria, and Ecuador's Multiple Traffic Light (MTL). Overall, the proportion of foods classified as compliant by the HSR, MTL and MCNE models was similar to the PAHO model. In contrast, the NPSC, the MNS and the CWO-2016 classified a higher amount of foods as compliant. Larger differences between NPS classification were observed across food categories. Results support the notion that models developed with the involvement of food manufacturers are more permissive than those based on scientific evidence. Results highlight the importance of thoroughly evaluating the underlying criteria of a model.

Indexed as

FoodFood HandlingFood LabelingNutritive ValueFast FoodsFood AnalysisHumansMexicoReproducibility of ResultsChilean Warning Octagonscritical nutrientsHealth Star RatingMexican Nutrition Sealmultiple traffic lightNPSCnutrient profiling systemPAHO modelultra-processed products

Identifiers

PMID29880737
PMCPMC6024607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.