Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29880562›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Family networks and infant health promotion: a mixed-methods evaluation from a cluster randomised controlled trial in rural Malawi.

Molly Scott, Bansi Malde, Carina King, Tambosi Phiri, Hilda Chapota, Esther Kainja, Florida Banda, Marcos Vera-Hernandez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Molly ScottOxford Policy Management, Oxford, UK.
Bansi MaldeCentre for Evaluation of Development Policies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1323-3383
Carina KingInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6885-6716
Tambosi PhiriMaiMwana Project, Mchinji, Malawi.
Hilda ChapotaMaiMwana Project, Mchinji, Malawi.
Esther KainjaMaiMwana Project, Mchinji, Malawi.
Florida BandaMaiMwana Project, Mchinji, Malawi.
Marcos Vera-HernandezCentre for Evaluation of Development Policies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveParents may rely on information provided by extended family members when making decisions concerning the health of their children. We evaluate whether extended family members affected the success of an information intervention promoting infant health.

methodsThis is a secondary, sequential mixed-methods study based on a cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led home-education intervention conducted in Mchinji District, Malawi. We used linear multivariate regression to test whether the intervention impact on child height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) was influenced by extended family members. 12 of 24 clusters were assigned to the intervention, in which all pregnant women and new mothers were eligible to receive 5 home visits from a trained peer counsellor to discuss infant care and nutrition. We conducted focus group discussions with mothers, grandmothers and peer counsellors, and key-informant interviews with husbands, chiefs and community health workers to better understand the roles of extended family members in infant feeding.

resultsExposure to the intervention increased child HAZ scores by 0.296 SD (95% CI 0.116 to 0.484). However, this effect is smaller in the presence of paternal grandmothers. Compared with an effect size of 0.441 to 0.467 SD (95% CI -0.344 to 1.050) if neither grandmother is alive, the effect size was 0.235 (95% CI -0.493 to 0.039) to 0.253 (95% CI -0.529 to 0.029) SD lower if the paternal grandmother was alive. There was no evidence of an effect of parents' siblings. Maternal grandmothers did not affect intervention impact, but were associated with a lower HAZ score in the control group. Qualitative analysis suggested that grandmothers, who act as secondary caregivers and provide resources for infants, were slower to dismiss traditionally held practices and adopt intervention messages.

conclusionThe results indicate that the intervention impacts are diminished by paternal grandmothers. Intervention success could be increased by integrating senior women.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersFamily RelationsFeeding BehaviorInfant HealthAdultChild DevelopmentCounselingDietFemaleFocus GroupsGrandparentsHealth EducationHouse CallsHumansInfantInfant, Newbornchild healthextended familyhealth promotionnutritionsub-saharan africa

Identifiers

PMID29880562
PMCPMC6009513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.