Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29880301›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2018

Effectiveness of targeted enhanced terminal room disinfection on hospital-wide acquisition and infection with multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile: a secondary analysis of a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with crossover design (BETR Disinfection).

Deverick J Anderson, Rebekah W Moehring, David J Weber, Sarah S Lewis, Luke F Chen, J Conrad Schwab, Paul Becherer, Michael Blocker, Patricia F Triplett, Lauren P Knelson and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01579370 (A Four-arm Prospective, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Feasibility of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection With Chlorine and UV Light Using Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01579370 nacompletednot on this map

A Four-arm Prospective, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Feasibility of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection With Chlorine and UV Light Using Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2012 to 2015Enrolled21,395ConditionsMultidrug Resistant Organisms, Healthcare Associated InfectionsArmsQuaternary ammonium, Bleach, Quaternary ammonium and UV-C light, Bleach and UV-C light
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Ultraviolet-C Light Evaluation as Adjunct Disinfection to Remove Multidrug-Resistant Organisms.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Trial
  5. Evaluation of endoscopic processing on the potential forInfection prevention in practice · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Screening and targeted prophylaxis for Clostridioides difficile infection.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Three stages of laboratory stewardship in improving appropriateAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Impact of UV-C on material degradation: a scoping literature review.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Strategies to preventInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Deverick J AndersonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: deverick.anderson@duke.edu.
Rebekah W MoehringDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
David J WeberDepartment of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Health Care, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sarah S LewisDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Luke F ChenDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
J Conrad SchwabChesapeake Regional Medical Center, Chesapeake, VA, USA.
Paul BechererRex Healthcare, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Michael BlockerAlamance Regional Medical Center, Burlington, NC, USA; Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Patricia F TriplettHigh Point Regional Hospital, High Point, NC, USA.
Lauren P KnelsonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Yuliya LokhnyginaDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA.
William A RutalaDepartment of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Health Care, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Daniel J SextonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
CDC Prevention Epicenters Program
Duke University · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · USAlamance Community College · USDurham VA Medical Center · USHigh Point University · USRegional Medical Center · USRex Hospital · US

Funding

Defining Measures of Impact for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Community HospitalsK08HS023866 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOEHRING, REBEKAH WHITE · 2015 to 2019
$739k
Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in a CommuniK23AI095357 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, DEVERICK JOHN · 2011 to 2015
$644k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS023866NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000164NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000483NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI095357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hospital environment is a source of pathogen transmission. The effect of enhanced disinfection strategies on the hospital-wide incidence of infection has not been investigated in a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of four disinfection strategies on hospital-wide incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile in the Benefits of Enhanced Terminal Room (BETR) Disinfection study.

methodsWe did a prespecified secondary analysis of the results from the BETR Disinfection study, a pragmatic, multicentre, crossover cluster-randomised trial that assessed four different strategies for terminal room disinfection in nine hospitals in the southeastern USA. Rooms from which a patient with a specific infection or colonisation (due to the target organisms C difficile, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), or multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp) was discharged were terminally disinfected with one of four strategies: standard disinfection (quaternary ammonium disinfectant, except for C difficile, for which 10% hypochlorite [bleach] was used; reference); standard disinfection and disinfecting ultraviolet light (UV-C), except for C difficile, for which bleach and UV-C was used (UV strategy); 10% hypochlorite (bleach strategy); and bleach and UV-C (bleach and UV strategy). We randomly assigned the sequence of strategies for each hospital (1:1:1:1), and each strategy was used for 7 months, including a 1-month wash-in period and 6 months of data collection. The prespecified secondary outcomes were hospital-wide, hospital-acquired incidence of all target organisms (calculated as number of patients with hospital-acquired infection with a target organism per 10 000 patient days), and hospital-wide, hospital-acquired incidence of each target organism separately. BETR Disinfection is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01579370.

findingsBetween April, 2012, and July, 2014, there were 271 740 unique patients with 375 918 admissions. 314 610 admissions met all inclusion criteria (n=73 071 in the reference study period, n=81 621 in the UV study period, n=78 760 in the bleach study period, and n=81 158 in the bleach and UV study period). 2681 incidenct cases of hospital-acquired infection or colonisation occurred during the study. There was no significant difference in the hospital-wide risk of target organism acquisition between standard disinfection and the three enhanced terminal disinfection strategies for all target multidrug-resistant organisms (UV study period relative risk [RR] 0·89, 95% CI 0·79-1·00; p=0·052; bleach study period 0·92, 0·79-1·08; p=0·32; bleach and UV study period 0·99, 0·89-1·11; p=0·89). The decrease in risk in the UV study period was driven by decreases in risk of acquisition of C difficile (RR 0·89, 95% CI 0·80-0·99; p=0·031) and VRE (0·56, 0·31-0·996; p=0·048).

interpretationEnhanced terminal room disinfection with UV in a targeted subset of high-risk rooms led to a decrease in hospital-wide incidence of C difficile and VRE. Enhanced disinfection overcomes limitations of standard disinfection strategies and is a potential strategy to reduce the risk of acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms and C difficile.

fundingUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClostridium InfectionsCross InfectionCross-Over StudiesDisinfectantsDisinfectionHospitalsHumansQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSodium HypochloriteSoutheastern United StatesUltraviolet RaysDisinfectantsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSodium Hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID29880301
PMCPMC6487496
OpenAlexW2805144729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.