Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29880052›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Understanding the complex relationships among actors involved in the implementation of public-private mix (PPM) for TB control in India, using social theory.

Solomon Salve, Kristine Harris, Kabir Sheikh, John D H Porter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Solomon SalveHealth Governance Hub Public Health Foundation of India, Plot No. 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002, India. solomon.salve@gmail.com.
Kristine HarrisDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7H, UK.
Kabir SheikhHealth Governance Hub, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot No. 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002, India.
John D H PorterDepartments of Clinical Research and Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7H, UK.
Public Health Foundation of India · INLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

BMC membership fund AL-UCTCHESAI-BMCSO-1116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic Private Partnerships (PPP) are increasingly utilized as a public health strategy for strengthening health systems and have become a core component for the delivery of TB control services in India, as promoted through national policy. However, partnerships are complex systems that rely on relationships between a myriad of different actors with divergent agendas and backgrounds. Relationship is a crucial element of governance, and relationship building an important aspect of partnerships. To understand PPPs a multi-disciplinary perspective that draws on insights from social theory is needed. This paper demonstrates how social theory can aid the understanding of the complex relationships of actors involved in implementation of Public-Private Mix (PPM)-TB policy in India.

methodsEthnographic research was conducted within a district in a Southern state of India over a 14 month period, combining participant observations, informal interactions and in-depth interviews with a wide range of respondents across public, private and non-government organisation (NGO) sectors.

resultsDrawing on the theoretical insights from Bourdieu's "theory of practice" this study explores the relationships between the different actors. The study found that programme managers, frontline TB workers, NGOs, and private practitioners all had a crucial role to play in TB partnerships. They were widely regarded as valued contributors with distinct social skills and capabilities within their organizations and professions. However, their potential contributions towards programme implementation tended to be unrecognized both at the top and bottom of the policy implementation chain. These actors constantly struggled for recognition and used different mechanisms to position themselves alongside other actors within the programme that further complicated the relationships between different actors.

conclusionThis paper demonstrates that applying social theory can enable a better understanding of the complex relationship across public, private and NGO sectors. A closer understanding of these processes is a prerequisite for bridging the gap between field-level practices and central policy intentions, facilitating a move towards more effective partnership strategies for strengthening local health systems. The study contributes to our understanding of implementation of PPP for TB control and builds knowledge to help policy makers and programme managers strengthen and effectively implement strategies to enable stronger governance of these partnerships.

Indexed as

Government ProgramsInterpersonal RelationsOrganizationsPrivate SectorPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsPublic SectorAdministrative PersonnelDelivery of Health CareGovernmentHealth PersonnelHealth PolicyHumansIndiaPublic HealthSocial TheoryTuberculosisAnthropologyPublic-private mixPublic private partnershipSocial theoryTB programme

Identifiers

PMID29880052
PMCPMC5991467
OpenAlexW2806157070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.