Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29880048›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2018

Results of a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led school-based intervention to increase the physical activity of adolescent girls (PLAN-A).

Simon J Sebire, Russell Jago, Kathryn Banfield, Mark J Edwards, Rona Campbell, Ruth Kipping, Peter S Blair, Bryar Kadir, Kirsty Garfield, Joe Matthews and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. A Systematic Literature Review of Peer-led Strategies for Promoting Physical Activity Levels of Adolescents.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simon J SebireCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Simon.Sebire@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7994-0844
Russell JagoCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kathryn BanfieldCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Mark J EdwardsCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rona CampbellDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ruth KippingDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Peter S BlairDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Bryar KadirDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kirsty GarfieldDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Joe MatthewsCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ronan A LyonsCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Bristol, UK.
William HollingworthDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UKBritish Heart FoundationCancer Research UKChief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health PHR/13/90/16Medical Research Council MC_PC_13043Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost adolescent girls in the UK do not meet government physical activity recommendations and effective interventions are needed. This study reports the results of a feasibility trial of PLAN-A, a novel school-based peer-led physical activity intervention for adolescent girls.

methodsA two-arm cluster randomised controlled feasibility study was conducted in six English secondary schools (4 intervention & 2 control). Year 8 (age 12-13) girls were eligible and randomisation was at school-level. The intervention involved training Year 8 girls (out of school for two consecutive days, plus one top-up day 5 weeks later), who were identified by their peers as influential, to provide informal support to their friends to increase their physical activity. Feasibility of the intervention and the research was examined, including: recruitment, training attendance and data provision rates, evidence of promise of the intervention to affect weekday moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), intervention cost and estimation of the sample size for a definitive trial. Accelerometer and questionnaire data were collected at the beginning of Year 8 (Time 0), the end of Year 8 (10-weeks after peer-supporter training) and the beginning of Year 9 (Time 2).

resultsFour hundred twenty-seven girls were recruited (95% recruitment rate). 55 girls consented to be a peer-supporter and 53 peer-supporters were trained (97% of those invited). Accelerometer return rates exceeded 85% at each time point and wear time criteria was met by 83%, 71% and 62% participants at Time 0, 1 and 2 respectively. Questionnaire data were provided by >91% of participants at each time point. Complete-case adjusted linear regression analysis showed evidence of a 6.09 minute (95% CI = 1.43, 10.76) between-arms difference in weekday MVPA at Time 2 in favour of the intervention arm. On average PLAN-A cost £2685 per school to deliver (£37 per Year 8 girl). There were no adverse events. A trial involving 20 schools would be adequately powered to detect a between-arms difference in weekday MVPA of at least six minutes.

conclusionsThe PLAN-A intervention adopts a novel peer-led approach, is feasible, and shows evidence of promise to positively affect girls' physical activity levels. A definitive trial is warranted.

trial registrationISCTRN, ISRCTN12543546, Registered on 28/7/2015, URL of registry record: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12543546.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorExercisePeer GroupSchool Health ServicesAdolescentCluster AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomAdolescent girlsInterventionPeersPhysical activitySchool

Identifiers

PMID29880048
PMCPMC5992776
OpenAlexW2806175554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.