ArticleBiology direct2018
Predicting clinical outcome of neuroblastoma patients using an integrative network-based approach.
Article in Biology direct, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Composite Clinical Outcomes for Childhood Neuroblastoma Using Multi-Omics Data and Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- An integrated analysis of the cancer genome atlas data discovers a hierarchical association structure across thirty three cancer types.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
- Network-based integration of multi-omics data for clinical outcome prediction in neuroblastoma.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- iMPTCE-Hnetwork: A Multilabel Classifier for Identifying Metabolic Pathway Types of Chemicals and Enzymes with a Heterogeneous Network.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- The ZNF750-RAC1 axis as potential prognostic factor for breast cancer.Cell death discovery · 2020Article
- Liquid biopsies and cancer omics.Cell death discovery · 2020Review
- Cancer predictive studies.Biology direct · 2020Review
- A deep neural network approach to predicting clinical outcomes of neuroblastoma patients.BMC medical genomics · 2019Article
- A novel framework for horizontal and vertical data integration in cancer studies with application to survival time prediction models.Biology direct · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne of the main current challenges in computational biology is to make sense of the huge amounts of multidimensional experimental data that are being produced. For instance, large cohorts of patients are often screened using different high-throughput technologies, effectively producing multiple patient-specific molecular profiles for hundreds or thousands of patients.
resultsWe propose and implement a network-based method that integrates such patient omics data into Patient Similarity Networks. Topological features derived from these networks were then used to predict relevant clinical features. As part of the 2017 CAMDA challenge, we have successfully applied this strategy to a neuroblastoma dataset, consisting of genomic and transcriptomic data. In particular, we observe that models built on our network-based approach perform at least as well as state of the art models. We furthermore explore the effectiveness of various topological features and observe, for instance, that redundant centrality metrics can be combined to build more powerful models.
conclusionWe demonstrate that the networks inferred from omics data contain clinically relevant information and that patient clinical outcomes can be predicted using only network topological data. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Yang-Yu Liu, Tomislav Smuc and Isabel Nepomuceno.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.