Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29880023›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2018

Hundreds of novel composite genes and chimeric genes with bacterial origins contributed to haloarchaeal evolution.

Raphaël Méheust, Andrew K Watson, François-Joseph Lapointe, R Thane Papke, Philippe Lopez, Eric Bapteste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Satellites in the prokaryote world.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raphaël MéheustSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7138 Evolution Paris Seine, 75005, Paris, France.
Andrew K WatsonSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7138 Evolution Paris Seine, 75005, Paris, France.
François-Joseph LapointeDépartement de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
R Thane PapkeDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Philippe LopezSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7138 Evolution Paris Seine, 75005, Paris, France.
Eric BaptesteSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7138 Evolution Paris Seine, 75005, Paris, France. epbapteste@gmail.com.

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council #615274NASA NNX15AM09GNational Science Foundation 1716046Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada OGP249644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaloarchaea, a major group of archaea, are able to metabolize sugars and to live in oxygenated salty environments. Their physiology and lifestyle strongly contrast with that of their archaeal ancestors. Amino acid optimizations, which lowered the isoelectric point of haloarchaeal proteins, and abundant lateral gene transfers from bacteria have been invoked to explain this deep evolutionary transition. We use network analyses to show that the evolution of novel genes exclusive to Haloarchaea also contributed to the evolution of this group.

resultsWe report the creation of 320 novel composite genes, both early in the evolution of Haloarchaea during haloarchaeal genesis and later in diverged haloarchaeal groups. One hundred and twenty-six of these novel composite genes derived from genetic material from bacterial genomes. These latter genes, largely involved in metabolic functions but also in oxygenic lifestyle, constitute a different gene pool from the laterally acquired bacterial genes formerly identified. These novel composite genes were likely advantageous for their hosts, since they show significant residence times in haloarchaeal genomes-consistent with a long phylogenetic history involving vertical descent and lateral gene transfer-and encode proteins with optimized isoelectric points.

conclusionsOverall, our work encourages a systematic search for composite genes across all archaeal major groups, in order to better understand the origins of novel prokaryotic genes, and in order to test to what extent archaea might have adjusted their lifestyles by incorporating and recycling laterally acquired bacterial genetic fragments into new archaeal genes.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsBacteriaEvolution, MolecularGenes, ArchaealGenes, BacterialGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialAmino AcidsArchaeal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29880023
PMCPMC5992828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.