Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2018
Secukinumab provides rapid and sustained pain relief in psoriatic arthritis over 2 years: results from the FUTURE 2 study.
Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01752634 (A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab in Prefilled Syringes to Demonstrate the Efficacy at 24 Weeks and to Assess the Long Term Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability up to 5 Years in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study of Subcutaneous Secukinumab in Prefilled Syringes to Demonstrate the Efficacy at 24 Weeks and to Assess the Long Term Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability up to 5 Years in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Guideline
- Effect of bimekizumab on symptoms and impact of disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis over 3 years: results from BE ACTIVE.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Impact of Upadacitinib on Reducing Pain in Patients Across the Axial Spondyloarthritis Spectrum: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Phase 2/3 SELECT-AXIS Studies.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Towards an individualised approach to pain management in inflammatory arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
- A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Guselkumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Over 52 Weeks.Rheumatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Retention rate of TNF inhibitors versus IL-17 inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis patients with prior biologics experience.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
- Expert Opinion Report on the Challenges in the Management of Psoriatic Arthritis in United Arab Emirates: A Focus on Interleukin-17 Inhibitors.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2025Article
- Safety and effectiveness of secukinumab subcutaneous injection in Japanese patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis: A post-marketing surveillance.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Observational
- An interdisciplinary perspective on peripheral drivers of pain in rheumatoid arthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Review
- Psoriatic arthritis from a mechanistic perspective.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022Review
- Psoriatic arthritis: prospects for the future.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022Review
- Secukinumab: A Review in Psoriatic Arthritis.Drugs · 2021Review
- Secukinumab leads to shifts from stage-based towards response-based disease clusters-comparative data from very early and established psoriatic arthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2020Observational
- Varicella Zoster and Cutaneous Candida Infection in a Patient With Ankylosing Spondylitis Under Treatment With Secukinumab.Archives of rheumatology · 2020Article
- The role of IL-17A in axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: recent advances and controversies.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2019Review
- Pain relief with secukinumab treatment.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain is one of the most important domains affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Secukinumab has demonstrated rapid and sustained improvements in signs and symptoms, including HRQoL, among patients with active PsA. This analysis evaluates the effect of secukinumab on patient-reported pain in PsA through 104 weeks of treatment.
methodsPain was assessed through week 104 using clinically relevant measures, including change from baseline in a pain visual analog scale (VAS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) bodily domain scores; proportion of patients reporting improvements equal to or better than minimum clinically meaningful differences in the pain VAS and SF-36 bodily pain domain scores; and proportion of patients with no, moderate, or extreme pain/discomfort measured by the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3 L) pain item scores. Correlations of pain measures were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Pre-specified analyses of TNF-naïve patients and patients who stopped TNF-inhibitors (TNFis) due to inadequate responses or safety/tolerability (TNF-IR patients) were performed using "as-observed data."
resultsMean improvements from baseline in pain VAS scores were greater with secukinumab versus placebo by week 3 (- 16.9; P < 0.0001 with secukinumab 300 mg and - 12.6; P < 0.05 with secukinumab 150 mg) and sustained through week 104. SF-36 bodily pain domain scores were significantly greater with 300 mg secukinumab and secukinumab 150 mg versus placebo by week 4 (16.2 and 16.3, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both), and these changes were maintained through week 104. With both secukinumab 300 mg and secukinumab 150 mg, improvements equal to or better than the minimum clinically meaningful differences in pain VAS and SF-36 bodily pain were significant versus placebo at week 3 and week 4, respectively. At week 4, 15%, 9%, and 5% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg, secukinumab 150 mg, and placebo, respectively, reported "no pain/discomfort" measured by EQ-5D-3 L; these proportions increased to week 104 with both secukinumab doses. Similarly, improvements in pain measures were significant in both TNF-naïve and TNF-IR patients.
conclusionSecukinumab provided rapid and sustained pain relief in PsA over 2 years of treatment. Improvements in pain were reported regardless of prior exposure to TNFis.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01752634 . Registered on 19 December 2012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.