Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879992›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

Determinants of antenatal care attendance among women residing in highly disadvantaged communities in northern Jordan: a cross-sectional study.

Heba H Hijazi, Mohammad S Alyahya, Amer M Sindiani, Rola S Saqan, Abdulhakeem M Okour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heba H HijaziDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. hhhijazi0@just.edu.jo.
Mohammad S AlyahyaDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Amer M SindianiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box: 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Rola S SaqanDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box: 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Abdulhakeem M OkourDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box: 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the major reproductive health challenges among disadvantaged populations is to provide pregnant women with the necessary antenatal care (ANC). In this study, we suggest applying an integrated conceptual framework aimed at ascertaining the extent to which attendance at ANC clinics may be attributed to individual determinants or to the quality of the care received.

methodsUsing a cross-sectional design, data were collected from a sample of 831 women residing in nine sub-districts in three northern governorates of Jordan and designated according to national categorization as persistent poverty pockets. All of the sampled women were recruited from public maternal and child health centers and interviewed using a structured pre-tested survey. This tool covered certain predictors, ranging from the user's attributes, including predisposing, enabling, and need factors, to the essential components of the experience of care. These components assessed the quality of ANC in terms of five elements: woman-provider relations, technical management, information exchange, continuity of care, and appropriate constellation of services. Adequate ANC content was assessed in relation to the frequency of antenatal visits and the time of each visit.

resultsThe results of multivariate logistic regression analyses show that the use of ANC facilities is affected by various factors related to the quality of service delivery. These include receiving information and education on ANC during clinic visits (OR = 9.1; 95% CI = 4.9-16.9), providing pregnant women with opportunities for dialogue and health talks (OR = 7.2; 95% CI = 4.1-12.8), having scheduled follow-up appointments (OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 3.5-12.0), and offering dignified and respectful care (OR = 5.7; 95% CI = 2.5-13.1). At the individual level, our findings have identified a woman's education level (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.1-1.3), desire for the pregnancy (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.1-2.7), and living in a district served by an ANC clinic (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 2.3-8.1) as determinants affecting ANC utilization.

conclusionTaking women's experiences of ANC as a key metric for reporting the quality of the care is more likely to lead to increased utilization of ANC services by women in highly disadvantaged communities. Our findings suggest that the degree to which women feel that they are respected, informed, and engaged in their care has potential favorable implications for ANC.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornJordanMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareSocioeconomic FactorsVulnerable PopulationsAntenatal careDisadvantaged communitiesExperience of careJordanPovertyQualityUtilization

Identifiers

PMID29879992
PMCPMC5992715
OpenAlexW2805687112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.