Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879967›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

The Association of Readiness for Interprofessional Learning with empathy, motivation and professional identity development in medical students.

Cora L F Visser, Janneke A Wilschut, Ulviye Isik, Stéphanie M E van der Burgt, Gerda Croiset, Rashmi A Kusurkar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cora L F VisserVUmc School of Medical Sciences & VUmc Amstel Academy, VU University Medical Center, Postbus 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. clf.visser@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-6869
Janneke A WilschutDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Decision Modeling Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ulviye IsikVUmc School of Medical Sciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stéphanie M E van der BurgtVUmc School of Medical Sciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerda CroisetVUmc School of Medical Sciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rashmi A KusurkarVUmc School of Medical Sciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale is among the first scales developed for measurement of attitude towards interprofessional learning (IPL). However, the conceptual framework of the RIPLS still lacks clarity. We investigated the association of the RIPLS with professional identity, empathy and motivation, with the intention of relating RIPLS to other well-known concepts in healthcare education, in an attempt to clarify the concept of readiness.

methodsReadiness for interprofessional learning, professional identity development, empathy and motivation of students for medical school, were measured in all 6 years of the medical curriculum. The association of professional identity development, empathy and motivation with readiness was analyzed using linear regression.

resultsEmpathy and motivation significantly explained the variance in RIPLS subscale Teamwork & Collaboration. Gender and belonging to the first study year had a unique positive contribution in explaining the variance of the RIPLS subscales Positive and Negative Professional Identity, whereas motivation had no contribution. More compassionate care, as an affective component of empathy, seemed to diminish readiness for IPL. Professional Identity, measured as affirmation or denial of the identification with a professional group, had no contribution in the explanation of the variance in readiness.

conclusionsThe RIPLS is a suboptimal instrument, which does not clarify the 'what' and 'how' of IPL in a curriculum. This study suggests that students' readiness for IPE may benefit from a combination with the cognitive component of empathy ('Perspective taking') and elements in the curriculum that promote autonomous motivation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmpathyInterdisciplinary PlacementMotivationProfessional RoleCooperative BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleReproducibility of ResultsSex FactorsStudents, MedicalYoung AdultEmpathyInterprofessional learningProfessional identity developmentReadiness for IPLShared learning

Identifiers

PMID29879967
PMCPMC5991439
OpenAlexW2806734410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.