Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879918›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

METHimpute: imputation-guided construction of complete methylomes from WGBS data.

Aaron Taudt, David Roquis, Amaryllis Vidalis, René Wardenaar, Frank Johannes, Maria Colomé-Tatché

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. slideimp: efficient imputation of DNA methylation data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nanorate sequencing reveals theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational Methods for Single-cell DNA Methylome Analysis.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023
    Review
  16. Methylome Imputation by Methylation Patterns.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron TaudtEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, NL-9713 AV, The Netherlands.
David RoquisDepartment of Plant Sciences, Hans Eisenmann-Zentrum for Agricultural Sciences, Technical University Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, Freising, 85354, Germany.
Amaryllis VidalisDepartment of Plant Sciences, Hans Eisenmann-Zentrum for Agricultural Sciences, Technical University Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, Freising, 85354, Germany.
René WardenaarDepartment of Plant Sciences, Hans Eisenmann-Zentrum for Agricultural Sciences, Technical University Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, Freising, 85354, Germany.
Frank JohannesDepartment of Plant Sciences, Hans Eisenmann-Zentrum for Agricultural Sciences, Technical University Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, Freising, 85354, Germany. frank@johanneslab.org.
Maria Colomé-TatchéEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, NL-9713 AV, The Netherlands. maria.colome@helmholtz-muenchen.de.

Funding

Helmholtz Association's Initiative and Networking Fund VH-NG-1219Seventh Framework Programme 291763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) has become the standard method for interrogating plant methylomes at base resolution. However, deep WGBS measurements remain cost prohibitive for large, complex genomes and for population-level studies. As a result, most published plant methylomes are sequenced far below saturation, with a large proportion of cytosines having either missing data or insufficient coverage.

resultsHere we present METHimpute, a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) based imputation algorithm for the analysis of WGBS data. Unlike existing methods, METHimpute enables the construction of complete methylomes by inferring the methylation status and level of all cytosines in the genome regardless of coverage. Application of METHimpute to maize, rice and Arabidopsis shows that the algorithm infers cytosine-resolution methylomes with high accuracy from data as low as 6X, compared to data with 60X, thus making it a cost-effective solution for large-scale studies.

conclusionsMETHimpute provides methylation status calls and levels for all cytosines in the genome regardless of coverage, thus yielding complete methylomes even with low-coverage WGBS datasets. The method has been extensively tested in plants, but should also be applicable to other species. An implementation is available on Bioconductor.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenomicsWhole Genome SequencingMarkov ChainsPlantsSequence Analysis, DNASulfiteshydrogen sulfiteSulfitesHidden Markov ModelImputationMethylationWhole-genome bisulfite sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29879918
PMCPMC5992726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.