Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879903›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

The whole transcriptome effects of the PPARα agonist fenofibrate on livers of hepatocyte humanized mice.

Montserrat A de la Rosa Rodriguez, Go Sugahara, Guido J E J Hooiveld, Yuji Ishida, Chise Tateno, Sander Kersten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Integration of mechanistic and repeat dose toxicity data in the derivation of an oral reference dose for HFPO-DA.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Montserrat A de la Rosa RodriguezNutrition, Metabolism and Genomics group, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Go SugaharaResearch and Development Department, PhoenixBio, Co., Ltd, 3-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-, Hiroshima, Japan.
Guido J E J HooiveldNutrition, Metabolism and Genomics group, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Yuji IshidaResearch and Development Department, PhoenixBio, Co., Ltd, 3-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-, Hiroshima, Japan.
Chise TatenoResearch and Development Department, PhoenixBio, Co., Ltd, 3-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-, Hiroshima, Japan.
Sander KerstenNutrition, Metabolism and Genomics group, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands. sander.kersten@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4488-7734
Wageningen University & Research · NLHiroshima University · JPPhoenixBio (Japan) · JP

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 2014/12392/ALWNetherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative/Dutch Heart Foundation CVON2014-ENERGISE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of PPARα in gene regulation in mouse liver is well characterized. However, less is known about the role of PPARα in human liver. The aim of the present study was to better characterize the impact of PPARα activation on gene regulation in human liver. To that end, chimeric mice containing hepatocyte humanized livers were given an oral dose of 300 mg/kg fenofibrate daily for 4 days. Livers were collected and analyzed by hematoxilin and eosin staining, qPCR, and transcriptomics. Transcriptomics data were compared with existing datasets on PPARα activation in normal mouse liver, human primary hepatocytes, and human precision cut liver slices.

resultsOf the different human liver models, the gene expression profile of hepatocyte humanized livers most closely resembled actual human liver. In the hepatocyte humanized mouse livers, the human hepatocytes exhibited excessive lipid accumulation. Fenofibrate increased the size of the mouse but not human hepatocytes, and tended to reduce steatosis in the human hepatocytes. Quantitative PCR indicated that induction of PPARα targets by fenofibrate was less pronounced in the human hepatocytes than in the residual mouse hepatocytes. Transcriptomics analysis indicated that, after filtering, a total of 282 genes was significantly different between fenofibrate- and control-treated mice (P < 0.01). 123 genes were significantly lower and 159 genes significantly higher in the fenofibrate-treated mice, including many established PPARα targets such as FABP1, HADHB, HADHA, VNN1, PLIN2, ACADVL and HMGCS2. According to gene set enrichment analysis, fenofibrate upregulated interferon/cytokine signaling-related pathways in hepatocyte humanized liver, but downregulated these pathways in normal mouse liver. Also, fenofibrate downregulated pathways related to DNA synthesis in hepatocyte humanized liver but not in normal mouse liver.

conclusionThe results support the major role of PPARα in regulating hepatic lipid metabolism, and underscore the more modest effect of PPARα activation on gene regulation in human liver compared to mouse liver. The data suggest that PPARα may have a suppressive effect on DNA synthesis in human liver, and a stimulatory effect on interferon/cytokine signalling.

Indexed as

ChimeraAnimalsFenofibrateHepatocytesHumansLiverMicePPAR alphaTranscriptomeFenofibratePPAR alphaDNA synthesisFenofibrateHepatocyte humanized miceLipid metabolismPPARαTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29879903
PMCPMC5991453
OpenAlexW2806597817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.