Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879896›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

Homeotic transformations reflect departure from the mammalian 'rule of seven' cervical vertebrae in sloths: inferences on the Hox code and morphological modularity of the mammalian neck.

Christine Böhmer, Eli Amson, Patrick Arnold, Anneke H van Heteren, John A Nyakatura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Homeotic and nonhomeotic patterns in the tetrapod vertebral formula.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Limb positioning and initiation: An evolutionary context of pattern and formation.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine BöhmerUMR 7179 CNRS/MNHN, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier, CP-55, Paris, France. boehmer@vertevo.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1931-0888
Eli AmsonAG Morphologie und Formengeschichte, Institut für Biologie, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstraße 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Patrick ArnoldInstitut für Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung mit Phyletischem Museum, Ernst-Haeckel-Haus und Biologiedidaktik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Erbertstraße 1, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Anneke H van HeterenSektion Mammalogie, SNSB - Zoologische Staatssammlung, Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247, München, Germany.
John A NyakaturaAG Morphologie und Formengeschichte, Institut für Biologie, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstraße 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEMuseum für Naturkunde · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG AM 517/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG EXC 1027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSloths are one of only two exceptions to the mammalian 'rule of seven' vertebrae in the neck. As a striking case of breaking the evolutionary constraint, the explanation for the exceptional number of cervical vertebrae in sloths is still under debate. Two diverging hypotheses, both ultimately linked to the low metabolic rate of sloths, have been proposed: hypothesis 1 involves morphological transformation of vertebrae due to changes in the Hox gene expression pattern and hypothesis 2 assumes that the Hox gene expression pattern is not altered and the identity of the vertebrae is not changed. Direct evidence supporting either hypothesis would involve knowledge of the vertebral Hox code in sloths, but the realization of such studies is extremely limited. Here, on the basis of the previously established correlation between anterior Hox gene expression and the quantifiable vertebral shape, we present the morphological regionalization of the neck in three different species of sloths with aberrant cervical count providing indirect insight into the vertebral Hox code.

resultsShape differences within the cervical vertebral column suggest a mouse-like Hox code in the neck of sloths. We infer an anterior shift of HoxC-6 expression in association with the first thoracic vertebra in short-necked sloths with decreased cervical count, and a posterior shift of HoxC-5 and HoxC-6 expression in long-necked sloths with increased cervical count.

conclusionAlthough only future developmental analyses in non-model organisms, such as sloths, will yield direct evidence for the evolutionary mechanism responsible for the aberrant number of cervical vertebrae, our observations lend support to hypothesis 1 indicating that the number of modules is retained but their boundaries are displaced. Our approach based on quantified morphological differences also provides a reliable basis for further research including fossil taxa such as extinct 'ground sloths' in order to trace the pattern and the underlying genetic mechanisms in the evolution of the vertebral column in mammals.

Indexed as

Genes, HomeoboxAnimalsBiological EvolutionCervical VertebraeDatabases as TopicSlothsSpecies SpecificityAxial patterningCervical vertebraeConstraintEvolutionHox genesXenarthra

Identifiers

PMID29879896
PMCPMC5992679
OpenAlexW2805705756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.