Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879881›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2018

Machine Learning-based Virtual Screening and Its Applications to Alzheimer's Drug Discovery: A Review.

Kristy A Carpenter, Xudong Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantum computing applications in drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Drug-Target Interaction Prediction with PIGLET.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Benchmarking Molecular Mutation Operators for Evolutionary Drug Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Virtual screening: hope, hype, and the fine line in between.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. In Silico Validation of AI-Assisted Drugs in Healthcare.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Databases of ligand-binding pockets and protein-ligand interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristy A CarpenterNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, United States.
Xudong HuangNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, United States.

Funding

Nanoneurotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanomaterials and NeurodegenerationR01AG056614 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HUANG, XUDONG · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual Screening (VS) has emerged as an important tool in the drug development process, as it conducts efficient in silico searches over millions of compounds, ultimately increasing yields of potential drug leads. As a subset of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML) is a powerful way of conducting VS for drug leads. ML for VS generally involves assembling a filtered training set of compounds, comprised of known actives and inactives. After training the model, it is validated and, if sufficiently accurate, used on previously unseen databases to screen for novel compounds with desired drug target binding activity.

objectiveThe study aims to review ML-based methods used for VS and applications to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) drug discovery.

methodsTo update the current knowledge on ML for VS, we review thorough backgrounds, explanations, and VS applications of the following ML techniques: Naïve Bayes (NB), k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN).

resultsAll techniques have found success in VS, but the future of VS is likely to lean more largely toward the use of neural networks - and more specifically, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), which are a subset of ANN that utilize convolution. We additionally conceptualize a work flow for conducting ML-based VS for potential therapeutics for AD, a complex neurodegenerative disease with no known cure and prevention. This both serves as an example of how to apply the concepts introduced earlier in the review and as a potential workflow for future implementation.

conclusionDifferent ML techniques are powerful tools for VS, and they have advantages and disadvantages albeit. ML-based VS can be applied to AD drug development.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalMachine LearningAlzheimer DiseaseBayes TheoremHumansNeuroprotective AgentsNeuroprotective AgentsAlzheimer's diseaseArtificial intelligenceartificial neural networksconvolutional neural networksdrug discoveryk-nearest neighborsmachine learningnaïve bayesrandom forestssupport vector machinesvirtual screening.

Identifiers

PMID29879881
PMCPMC6327115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.