Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879847›Full record

ArticleClinical rehabilitation2018

The Sano study: justification and detailed description of a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic low back pain.

Anne Mette Schmidt, Helle Terkildsen Maindal, Trine Bay Laurberg, Berit Schiøttz-Christensen, Charlotte Ibsen, Kirstine Bak Gulstad, Thomas Maribo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02884466 (Comparison of Two Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain - A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02884466 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Two Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain - A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanoRan2016 to 2019Enrolled165ConditionsLow Back PainArmsMultidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Mette Schmidt1 Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-4985
Helle Terkildsen Maindal4 Section for Health Promotion and Health Services, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Trine Bay Laurberg2 Sano Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Berit Schiøttz-Christensen7 Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebælt, Middelfart, Denmark.
Charlotte Ibsen1 Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Kirstine Bak Gulstad2 Sano Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas Maribo1 Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKSteno Diabetes Centers · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: To justify and describe an integrated rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain prior to evaluation in a randomized controlled trial.

method: The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was used as a structural framework for the description of the integrated rehabilitation programme. As a part of the description, the Medical Research Council guidance, 'Developing and evaluating complex interventions', was used as a framework to justify the integrated rehabilitation programme. INTERVENTION DESCRIPTION:: The integrated rehabilitation programme adopts a participatory biopsychosocial approach integrating inpatient activities supported by a multidisciplinary team and learning located within the patient's own environment. The integrated rehabilitation programme comprises 3 weeks of inpatient stay and 11 weeks of home-based activities. The inpatient part of the programme consists of 38 clinical activities, some of them delivered more than once. The 38 clinical activities were described in an activity sheet developed for this purpose, combining five items from the TIDieR.

conclusion: An integrated rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain has been justified and described. The intervention description is currently being used for successful structuring and standardization of the content and delivery of the integrated rehabilitation programme in a randomized controlled trial. TRAIL REGISTRATION:: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02884466.

Indexed as

HumansLow Back PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRehabilitation Centersbiopsychosocial modelChronic low back paincomplex interventionsmedical research council (MRC) guidanceTIDieR

Identifiers

PMID29879847
PMCPMC6204649
OpenAlexW2807553109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.