ArticleAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences2020
Comparison of in vitro digestibility and chemical composition among four crop straws treated by Pleurotus ostreatus.
Article in Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-ensiling corn silage withAIMS microbiology · 2026Article
- Improving the Quality of Ensiling High-Moisture Alfalfa with Peanut Vine in Different Additives: Fermentation, Nutritional Quality, and Microbial Communities.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Article
- Solid-State Fermentation with White Rot Fungi (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of Malic Acid and Sucrose on the Fermentation Parameters, CNCPS Nitrogen Fractions, and Bacterial Community ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe effects of Pleurotus ostreatus on the feed utilization improvement of broad bean stalks (BBS), rape straw (RS), paddy straw (PS) and corn stalk (CS) was examined.
methodsThe four roughages were co-cultured with Pleurotus ostreatus. The chemical composition; enzyme activities of laccase, carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase) and xylanase; carbohydrate and protein fractions (based on CNCPS) were assessed at different days after inoculation (7, 14, 21, 28 d) and un-inoculated roughages (control, 0 d). The digestibility of nutrient compenentscomponents and the gas production of roughage with various incubation times were monitored at 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h using an in vitro ruminal fermentation method.
resultsA higher CMCase activity (0.1039 U/mL) and earlier time to peak (14 d) were detected in Pleurotus ostreatus cultured with CS (P < 0.05). Significantly, the incubation length-dependent responses of cumulative gas production were observed from 24 to 72 hours post fermentation (P < 0.05), and these incubation length-dependent effects on cumulative gas production of PS and CS were appeared earlier (24 h) for PS and CS than those (48 h) for BBS and RS (P < 0.05). The fast-degradable carbohydrate (CA) content for all four roughages significantly increased over time (P < 0.05). Nonetheless, increased degradation efficiency for CA treated with Pleurotus ostreatus was detected at both 21 and 28 days of incubation (P < 0.05). With the exception of PS (P < 0.05), there were no significant difference among the roughages (P > 0.05) in slowly-degradable carbohydrate (CB2) at different incubation times (P < 0.05).
conclusionAssessment of the alterations in chemical composition, CNCPS system fractions, and the fermentation kinetics after biological pretreatment may yield valuable database for evaluating the biological pretreatment of Pleurotus ostreatus in ruminants feed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.