Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879633›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2018

Adolescent dual-product users: Acquisition and situational use of cigarettes and cigars.

Erika S Trapl, Sarah J Koopman Gonzalez, Craig S Fryer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erika S TraplPrevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7069, United States. Electronic address: Erika.Trapl@case.edu.
Sarah J Koopman GonzalezPrevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7069, United States. Electronic address: Sarah.Koopman@case.edu.
Craig S FryerMaryland Center for Health Equity, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, 4200 Valley Drive, 1234X SPH Building, College Park, MD, 20742, United States. Electronic address: csfryer@umd.edu.

Funding

Prevention Research Center for Healthy NeighborhoodsU48DP005030 · DP · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BORAWSKI, ELAINE A. · 2014 to 2018
$6.8M
PROMOTING HEALTH AND PREVENTING DISEASE IN DISADVANTAGED URBAN NEIGHBORHOODSU48DP001930 · DP · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BORAWSKI, ELAINE A. · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
Sci-Tech Core-Maryland Population Research CenterP2CHD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Susan W Parker · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
Correlates of Nicotine Dependence among Urban African American YouthK01CA148789 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FRYER, CRAIG S. · 2010 to 2014
$633k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001930NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005030NCI NIH HHS K01 CA148789NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about how adolescents who smoke both cigarettes and cigar products obtain and use these products. This study sought to explore cigarette and cigar acquisition and situational use among high school smokers.

methodsData are drawn from the 2011 Cuyahoga County Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Analysis was limited to youth who smoke cigarettes as well as cigars, cigarillos, and little cigars (CCLC) in the past month (N = 649). Consumption of both products was calculated and used to create four subtypes of users based on high or low use of each product (Dual High, Dual Low, High CCLC/Low Cigarette, and Low CCLC/High Cigarette users). Current users were asked to identify situations in which they use cigarettes and CCLCs and ways in which they obtain these products. Data were analyzed overall and by user subtype.

resultsYouth reported acquiring cigarettes and CCLC in similar ways, although youth were more likely to take cigarettes from family members than CCLC (11.1% vs. 4.8%). Several differences were observed between cigarettes and CCLC for situational use. While both products are frequently used in social situations (e.g., with friends), cigarettes were more likely to be used in solitary situations (e.g., before bed). Further, significant differences were observed among the four user subtypes.

conclusionsStudy results highlight important, nuanced differences regarding how young multi-tobacco users obtain and the situational use of such products. Importantly, these findings vary by user subtype, informing future interventions to prevent and reduce smoking among the most vulnerable subgroups of youth.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleOhioRisk-TakingSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsTobacco Use DisorderYoung AdultAdolescentsCigarettesCigarsDual useSmokingTobacco

Identifiers

PMID29879633
PMCPMC6002754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.