Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879594›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2018

Advances in bioluminescence imaging: new probes from old recipes.

Zi Yao, Brendan S Zhang, Jennifer A Prescher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. OptimizediScience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Imaging Techniques in Pharmacological Precision Medicine.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zi YaoDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Brendan S ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Jennifer A PrescherDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. Electronic address: jpresche@uci.edu.

Funding

purchase of an All-in-One Fluorescence MicroscopeR01GM107630 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI PRESCHER, JENNIFER · 2013 to 2021
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioluminescent probes are powerful tools for visualizing biology in live tissues and whole animals. Recent years have seen a surge in the number of new luciferases, luciferins, and related tools available for bioluminescence imaging. Many were crafted using classic methods of optical probe design and engineering. Here we highlight recent advances in bioluminescent tool discovery and development, along with applications of the probes in cells, tissues, and organisms. Collectively, these tools are improving in vivo imaging capabilities and bolstering new research directions.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLuciferasesLuminescenceLuminescent AgentsLuminescent MeasurementsOptical ImagingLuciferasesLuminescent Agents

Identifiers

PMID29879594
PMCPMC6076869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.