Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879283›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2018

Safety and Efficacy of Panitumumab Plus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Primary HER2-Negative Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

Naoko Matsuda, Xiaoping Wang, Bora Lim, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Ricardo H Alvarez, Jie S Willey, Charla A Parker, Juhee Song, Yu Shen, Jianhua Hu and 16 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01036087 (Phase II Study of Panitumumab, Nab-paclitaxel, and Carboplatin for Patients With Primary Inflammatory Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01036087 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Study of Panitumumab, Nab-paclitaxel, and Carboplatin for Patients With Primary Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) Without HER2 Overexpression

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2010 to 2022Enrolled47ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPanitumumab, Nab-paclitaxel, Carboplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Panitumumab-Based EGFR Blockade in SMARCB1-Deficient Renal Medullary Carcinoma: Preclinical Basis and Prospective Clinical Activity.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Role of EGFR and FASN in breast cancer progression.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Tailoring Treatment for Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naoko MatsudaDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Xiaoping WangDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Bora LimDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Savitri KrishnamurthyMorgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Ricardo H AlvarezDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jie S WilleyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Charla A ParkerDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Juhee SongDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Yu ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jianhua HuDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Wenhui WuDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Nan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Gildy V BabieraMorgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
James L MurrayDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Banu K ArunDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Abenaa M BrewsterDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
James M ReubenMorgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael C StauderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Chad M BarnettDivision of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Wendy A WoodwardMorgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
H T Carisa Le-PetrossMorgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Anthony LucciMorgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Sarah M DeSnyderMorgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Vicente ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Naoto T UenoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Enhancing anti-EGFR Therapeutic Efficacy in Inflammatory Breast CancerR01CA205043 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI UENO, NAOTO T. · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Combining conventional chemotherapy with targeted therapy has been proposed to improve the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression is an independent predictor of low overall survival in patients with IBC. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative IBC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Women with primary HER2-negative IBC were enrolled from 2010 to 2015 and received panitumumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up time was 19.3 months. Tumor tissues collected before and after the first dose of panitumumab were subjected to immunohistochemical staining and RNA sequencing analysis to identify biomarkers predictive of pCR. Intervention: Patients received 1 dose of panitumumab (2.5 mg/kg) followed by 4 cycles of panitumumab (2.5 mg/kg), nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2), and carboplatin weekly and then 4 cycles of fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), epirubicin (100 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was pCR rate; the secondary end point was safety. The exploratory objective was to identify biomarkers predictive of pCR. Results: Forty-seven patients were accrued; 7 were ineligible. The 40 enrolled women had a median age of 57 (range, 23-68) years; 29 (72%) were postmenopausal. Three patients did not complete therapy because of toxic effects (n = 2) or distant metastasis (n = 1). Nineteen patients had triple-negative and 21 had hormone receptor-positive IBC. The pCR and pCR rates were overall, 11 of 40 (28%; 95% CI, 15%-44%); triple-negative IBC, 8 of 19 (42%; 95% CI, 20%-66%); and hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative IBC, 3 of 21 (14%; 95% CI, 3%-36%). During treatment with panitumumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin, 10 patients were hospitalized for treatment-related toxic effects, including 5 with neutropenia-related events. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most frequent nonhematologic adverse event was skin rash. Several potential predictors of pCR were identified, including pEGFR expression and COX-2 expression. Conclusions and Relevance: This combination of panitumumab and chemotherapy showed the highest pCR rate ever reported in triple-negative IBC. A randomized phase 2 study is ongoing to determine the role of panitumumab in patients with triple-negative IBC and to further validate predictive biomarkers. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01036087.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlopeciaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Therapy, CombinationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFatigueFemaleHumansLeukopeniaMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPanitumumabERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPanitumumab

Identifiers

PMID29879283
PMCPMC6143003
OpenAlexW2806289425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.