Trial reportPloS one2018
An open-label, multiple ascending dose study of the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab in viremic HIV patients.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03407105 (A Phase I, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of MDX-010 Administered Monthly as Immunotherapy in Subjects Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of MDX-010 Administered Monthly as Immunotherapy in Subjects Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expression Profile and Biological Role of Immune Checkpoints in Disease Progression of HIV/SIV Infection.Viruses · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- IL-21 and anti-α4β7 dual therapy during ART promotes immunological and microbiome responses in SIV-infected macaques.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Recent advances in CD8Heliyon · 2023Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors as potential therapy for reverting T-cell exhaustion and reverting HIV latency in people living with HIV.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Advances in HIV-1-specific chimeric antigen receptor cells to target the HIV-1 reservoir.Journal of virus eradication · 2022Article
- Immune checkpoint blockade in HIV.EBioMedicine · 2022Review
- Review
- Enhanced expression of immune checkpoint receptors during SARS-CoV-2 viral infection.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021Article
- On the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with viral infections including COVID-19.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2020Review
- Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade to Reverse HIV Latency.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2020Article
- Virus-Specific T Cell Therapies for HIV: Lessons Learned From Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Review
- The Role of Immunomodulatory Receptors in the Pathogenesis of HIV Infection: A Therapeutic Opportunity for HIV Cure?Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of virus-associated cancers.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2019Review
- Harnessing CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Immunotherapy in People With HIV and Cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Toward T Cell-Mediated Control or Elimination of HIV Reservoirs: Lessons From Cancer Immunology.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Infection: What Is the Interplay?In vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expression of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), a negative regulator of T-cell function, is increased in chronic HIV-1 infection. It was hypothesized that CTLA-4 blockade may enhance immune response to HIV-1 and result in better control of viremia. This open-label, multiple ascending dose study (NCT03407105)-the first to examine ipilimumab in participants with HIV-1 infection-assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ipilimumab, as well as whether ipilimumab enhanced immune response to HIV-1 and improved control of viremia. Twenty-four participants received 2 or 4 doses of ipilimumab (0.1, 1, 3, or 5 mg/kg) every 28 days. No serious adverse events (AEs) or dose-limiting toxicities were reported; one participant discontinued ipilimumab for an AE of grade 2 facial palsy. Twenty participants (83.3%) had ≥1 AE; all but 1 were grade 1 or 2. Eight participants (33.3%) had potentially immune-related AEs (7 had grade 1 diarrhea not requiring corticosteroids; 1 who had diarrhea also had transient antinuclear antibody positivity; 1 had grade 2 facial palsy requiring corticosteroids). Two participants (8.3%), one each in the 0.1- and 1-mg/kg dose groups, had a decrease from baseline HIV-1 RNA of 0.85 and 1.36 log10 copies/mL. Fourteen participants (58.3%) had an increase from baseline HIV-1 RNA (mean, 0.87 log10 copies/mL; range, 0.59-1.29). Of these 14 participants, all but 1 were in the higher ipilimumab dose groups (3 or 5 mg/kg). No pattern was noted regarding change from baseline in CD4 or CD8 T cells; ex vivo assessments of immune response were precluded because of inadequate cell viability. Serum concentration data for ipilimumab showed biphasic disposition, with steady state reached by dose 3. Ipilimumab treatment was well tolerated and was associated with variations in HIV-1 RNA in excess of expected repeat measures in most participants, but these were not related to combination antiretroviral therapy status or CD4 counts. The mechanism(s) underlying the increased variation in HIV-1 RNA is unclear and needs further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.