Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879126›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Components of day-to-day variability of cerebral perfusion measurements - Analysis of phase contrast mapping magnetic resonance imaging measurements in healthy volunteers.

Abd R A Ismaili, Mark B Vestergaard, Adam E Hansen, Henrik B W Larsson, Helle H Johannesen, Ian Law, Otto M Henriksen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unraveling diurnal and technical variability in cerebral hemodynamics from neurovascular 4D-Flow MRI.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abd R A IsmailiDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mark B VestergaardDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adam E HansenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik B W LarssonDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle H JohannesenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ian LawInstitute for Clinical Medicine, The Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Otto M HenriksenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1011-6934
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to investigate the components of day-to-day variability of repeated phase contrast mapping (PCM) magnetic resonance imaging measurements of global cerebral blood flow (gCBF). MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo dataset were analyzed. In Dataset 1 duplicated PCM measurements of total brain flow were performed in 11 healthy young volunteers on two separate days applying a strictly standardized setup. For comparison PCM measurements obtained from a previously published study (Dataset 2) were analyzed in order to assess long-term variability in an aged population in a less strictly controlled setup. Global CBF was calculated by normalizing total brain flow to brain volume. On each day measurements of hemoglobin, caffeine and glucose were obtained. Linear mixed models were applied to estimate coefficients of variation (CV) of total (CVt), between-subject (CVb), within-subject day-to-day (CVw), and intra-session residual variability (CVr).

resultsIn Dataset 1 CVt, CVb, CVw and CVr were estimated to be 11%, 9.4%, 4% and 4.2%, respectively, and to 8.8%, 7.2%, 2.7% and 4.3%, respectively, when adjusting for hemoglobin and plasma caffeine. In Dataset 2 CVt, CVb and CVw were estimated to be 25.4%, 19.2%, and 15.0%, respectively, and decreased to 16.6%, 8.2% and 12.5%, respectively, when adjusting for the same covariates. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that short-term day-to-day variability of gCBF is relatively low compared to between-subject variability when studied in standardized conditions, whereas long-term variability in an aged population appears to be much larger when studied in less a standardized setup. The results further showed that from 20% to 35% of the total variability in gCBF can be attributed to the effects of hemoglobin and caffeine.

Indexed as

AdultBlood Flow VelocityBrainCerebrovascular CirculationHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastPerfusion

Identifiers

PMID29879126
PMCPMC5991708
OpenAlexW2805491474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.