Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879118›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Single-dose rifampicin chemoprophylaxis protects those who need it least and is not a cost-effective intervention.

Diana N J Lockwood, Padebettu Krishnamurthy, Bhushan Kumar, Gerson Penna

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Leprosy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  4. Leprosy chemoprophylaxis of household contacts: A survey of Canadian infectious disease and tropical medicine specialists.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2022
    Article
  5. Treatment and Evaluation Advances in Leprosy Neuropathy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Unfinished business - Leprosy still not defeated.The Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diana N J LockwoodDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2865-8966
Padebettu KrishnamurthyDamien Foundation of India Trust, Chennai, India.
Bhushan KumarDepartment of Dermatology, STD and Leprosy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Gerson PennaTropical Medicine Centre, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ChemopreventionCost-Benefit AnalysisFamily CharacteristicsHumansLeprosy, MultibacillaryPreventive Health ServicesRifampinRifampin

Identifiers

PMID29879118
PMCPMC5991657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.