Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29879021›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

A novel heart rate variability based risk prediction model for septic patients presenting to the emergency department.

Mas'uud Ibnu Samsudin, Nan Liu, Sumanth Madhusudan Prabhakar, Shu-Ling Chong, Weng Kit Lye, Zhi Xiong Koh, Dagang Guo, R Rajesh, Andrew Fu Wah Ho, Marcus Eng Hock Ong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04335097 (Sensor Based Vital Signs Monitoring of Patients With Clinical Manifestation of Covid 19 Disease During Home Isolation, a Randomized Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04335097 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Sensor Based Vital Signs Monitoring of Patients With Clinical Manifestation of Covid 19 Disease During Home Isolation, a Randomized Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLars WikRan2020 to 2022Enrolled138ConditionsCOVID 19ArmsBiosensors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heart rate variability in acute pancreatitis: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  7. Embracing complexity in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Neurotransmitter system aberrations in patients with drug addiction.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A narrative review of heart rate and variability in sepsis.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mas'uud Ibnu SamsudinDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore Department of Emergency Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital SingHealth Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Singapore.
Nan Liu
Sumanth Madhusudan Prabhakar
Shu-Ling Chong
Weng Kit Lye
Zhi Xiong Koh
Dagang Guo
R Rajesh
Andrew Fu Wah Ho
Marcus Eng Hock Ong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quick, objective, non-invasive means of identifying high-risk septic patients in the emergency department (ED) can improve hospital outcomes through early, appropriate management. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has been correlated with mortality in critically ill patients. We aimed to develop a Singapore ED sepsis (SEDS) predictive model to assess the risk of 30-day in-hospital mortality in septic patients presenting to the ED. We used demographics, vital signs, and HRV parameters in model building and compared it with the modified early warning score (MEWS), national early warning score (NEWS), and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score.Adult patients clinically suspected to have sepsis in the ED and who met the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were included. Routine triage electrocardiogram segments were used to obtain HRV variables. The primary endpoint was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to derive the SEDS model. MEWS, NEWS, and qSOFA (initial and worst measurements) scores were computed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate their predictive performances.Of the 214 patients included in this study, 40 (18.7%) met the primary endpoint. The SEDS model comprises of 5 components (age, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, mean RR interval, and detrended fluctuation analysis α2) and performed with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.86), compared with 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.74), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61-0.79), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.79), 0.56 (95% CI: 0.46-0.66) by qSOFA (initial), qSOFA (worst), NEWS, and MEWS, respectively.HRV analysis is a useful component in mortality risk prediction for septic patients presenting to the ED.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAdultAgedArea Under CurveCritical IllnessElectrocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeart RateHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID29879021
PMCPMC5999455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.