Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878989›Full record

Trial reportPlastic and reconstructive surgery2018

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Elizabeth B Odom, Rajiv P Parikh, Grace Um, Simone W Kantola, Amy E Cyr, Julie A Margenthaler, Marissa M Tenenbaum, Terence M Myckatyn

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth B OdomFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Section of Endocrine and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Rajiv P ParikhFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Section of Endocrine and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Grace UmFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Section of Endocrine and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Simone W KantolaFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Section of Endocrine and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Amy E CyrFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Section of Endocrine and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Julie A MargenthalerFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Section of Endocrine and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Marissa M TenenbaumFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Section of Endocrine and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Terence M MyckatynFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Section of Endocrine and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Training Program in Cancer EpidemiologyT32CA009001 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI A. Heather Eliassen, Meir Stampfer · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNipple-sparing mastectomy offers several advantages for women seeking postmastectomy breast reconstruction, but compromised skin and nipple perfusion may lead to skin and nipple necrosis. It is unclear whether the incisional approach contributes to these complications; therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the impact of incision type on outcomes in patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy.

methodsThis is a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy with prosthetic breast reconstruction through an inframammary fold versus a lateral radial incision. Skin and nipple perfusion as represented by fluorescence intensity, mammometric parameters, patient-reported outcomes, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared for the two cohorts, and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the effects of covariates on outcomes.

resultsSeventy-nine patients were studied: 55 in the inframammary fold cohort and 24 in the lateral radial cohort. The inframammary fold group had significantly less fluorescence intensity to the inferior (21.9 percent versus 36.9 percent; p = 0.001) and lateral portions of breast skin (23.1 percent versus 40.7 percent; p = 0.003) after reconstruction. Decreased fluorescence intensity was associated with smoking, decreased mean arterial pressure, and greater specimen weight. Postreconstruction breast volumes were increased over preoperative volumes in the inframammary fold group (38.3 percent) versus the lateral radial (31.2 percent) group; however, patients with a lateral radial incision had a greater increase in satisfaction with their breasts and psychosocial well-being.

conclusionsThere are significant differences in patient-reported outcomes and final breast volumes based on the incisional approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy. These data can be used to guide providers and counsel patients considering nipple-sparing mastectomy with prosthetic reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMastectomy, SubcutaneousMiddle AgedNipplesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSkinTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29878989
PMCPMC6023732
OpenAlexW2805866589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.