Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878340›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2018

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Erenumab on Exercise Time During a Treadmill Test in Patients With Stable Angina.

Christophe Depre, Lubomir Antalik, Amaal Starling, Michael Koren, Osaro Eisele, Robert A Lenz, Daniel D Mikol

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02575833 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of AMG 334 on Exercise Time During a Treadmill Test in Subjects With Stable Angina), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02575833 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of AMG 334 on Exercise Time During a Treadmill Test in Subjects With Stable Angina

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2015 to 2017Enrolled89ConditionsStable AnginaArmsErenumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christophe DepreAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Lubomir AntalikCardiological Department, Regional Hospital, Slovakia (L. Antalik).
Amaal StarlingMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Michael KorenJacksonville Center for Clinical Research, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Osaro EiseleAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Robert A LenzAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Daniel D MikolAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USJacksonville Center for Clinical Research · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the potential impact of erenumab, a human anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor monoclonal antibody, on total exercise time (TET), time to exercise-induced angina, and ST depression in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with stable angina due to documented coronary artery disease.

backgroundThe relative importance of the CGRP receptor pathway during myocardial ischemia has not been established.

methodsAn exercise treadmill test was conducted following a single IV infusion of erenumab 140 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in exercise duration as measured by TET with a noninferiority margin of -90 seconds. Safety follow-up visits occurred through week 12. Eighty-eight participants were included in the analysis.

resultsLS mean (SE) change in TET was -2.9 [14.8] seconds in the erenumab group and 8.1 [14.4] seconds in placebo; adjusted mean (90% CI) treatment difference was -11.0 (-44.9, 22.9) seconds. The CI lower bound (-44.9 sec) did not reach pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -90 seconds, demonstrating that TET change from baseline in the erenumab group was non-inferior to placebo. There was no difference in time to exercise-induced angina in erenumab and placebo groups (median [90% CI] time of 500 [420, 540] vs 508 [405, 572] seconds; hazard ratio [90% CI]: 1.11 [0.73, 1.69], P = .69) or time to onset of ≥1 mm ST-segment depression (median [90% CI] time of 407 [380, 443] vs 420 [409,480] seconds; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.14 [0.76, 1.69], P = .59). Adverse events were reported by 27% and 32% of patients in erenumab and placebo groups.

conclusionsErenumab did not adversely affect exercise time in a high cardiovascular risk population of patients, supporting that inhibition of the canonical CGRP receptor does not worsen myocardial ischemia.

Indexed as

AgedAngina, StableAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsDouble-Blind MethodElectrocardiographyExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonistserenumabcalcitonin gene-related peptidecardiovascularclinical trialsafety

Identifiers

PMID29878340
PMCPMC6001517
OpenAlexW2805822893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.