Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878231›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2018

Caterpillar Climbing: Robust, Tension-Based Omni-Directional Locomotion.

Samuel C Vaughan, Huai-Ti Lin, Barry A Trimmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Competition between elasticity and adhesion in caterpillar locomotion.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel C VaughanDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Huai-Ti LinDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Barry A TrimmerDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals that must transition from horizontal to inclined or vertical surfaces typically change their locomotion strategy to compensate for the relative shift in gravitational forces. The species that have been studied have stiff articulated skeletons that allow them to redistribute ground reaction forces (GRFs) to control traction. Most also change their stepping patterns to maintain stability as they climb. In contrast, caterpillars, most of which are highly scansorial, soft-bodied, and lack rigid support or joints, can move with the same general kinematics in all orientations. In this study, we measure the GRFs exerted by the abdominal prolegs of Manduca sexta (Linnaeus) during locomotion. We show that, despite the orthogonal shift in gravitational forces, caterpillars use the same tension-based environmental skeleton strategy to crawl horizontally and to climb vertically. Furthermore, the transition from horizontal to vertical surfaces does not seem to require a change in gait; instead gravitational loading is used to help maintain a stance-phase body tension against which the muscles can pull the body upwards.

Indexed as

LocomotionAnimalsExtremitiesGaitLarvaMoths

Identifiers

PMID29878231
PMCPMC6007585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.