Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878222›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure.

Mirjana Stanic Benic, Romina Milanic, Annelie A Monnier, Inge C Gyssens, Niels Adriaenssens, Ann Versporten, Veronica Zanichelli, Marion Le Maréchal, Benedikt Huttner, Gianpiero Tebano and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic use in Brazilian hospitals in the 21st century: a systematic review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Short or Long Antibiotic Regimens in Orthopedics.The New England journal of medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Trends in hospital antibacterial consumption: a retrospective analysis of reimbursement data, Belgium 2017 to 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  16. Antibiotic de-escalation patterns and outcomes in critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia as informed by bronchoalveolar lavage results.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Mirjana Stanic BenicDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Romina MilanicUniversity of Rijeka Medical Faculty, Rijeka, Croatia.
Annelie A MonnierDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Inge C GyssensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niels AdriaenssensUniversity of Antwerp, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ann VersportenUniversity of Antwerp, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Antwerp, Belgium.
Veronica ZanichelliInfection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marion Le MaréchalUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Benedikt HuttnerInfection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gianpiero TebanoUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Marlies E HulscherScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Céline PulciniUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Jeroen SchoutenScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vera Vlahovic-PalcevskiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
DRIVE-AB WP1 group
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLInterdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est · FRUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Rijeka · HRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quantifying antibiotic use is an essential element of antibiotic stewardship since it allows comparison between different settings and time windows, and measurement of the impact of interventions. However, quantity metrics (QMs) and methods have not been standardized. Objectives: To propose a set of QMs for antibiotic use in inpatients (IQMs) that are accepted globally by professionals in a range of disciplines. The study was conducted within the Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) project. Methods: A systematic literature review using MEDLINE identified articles on measuring inpatient antibiotic use, published up to 29 January 2015. A consensually selected list of national and international web sites was screened for additional IQMs. IQMs were classified according to the type of numerator used and presented to a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus procedure, which consisted of two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting, was performed. Results: The systematic literature review and web site search identified 168 eligible articles from which an initial list of 20 IQMs, composed of 20 different numerators and associated denominators was developed. The consensus procedure resulted in a final set of 12 IQMs. Among this final set, DDDs per 100(0) patient-days and days of therapy per patient-days were most frequently found in the review. The panel recommended that antibiotic use should be expressed in at least two metrics simultaneously. Conclusions: Our consensus procedure identified a set of IQMs that we propose as an evidence-based global standard.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipHospitalsQuality Indicators, Health CareGlobal HealthHumansInpatientsInternationalityInternetSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29878222
PMCPMC5989607
OpenAlexW2807238000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.