Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878218›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Quality indicators assessing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting: a systematic review followed by an international multidisciplinary consensus procedure.

Marion Le Maréchal, Gianpiero Tebano, Annelie A Monnier, Niels Adriaenssens, Inge C Gyssens, Benedikt Huttner, Romina Milanic, Jeroen Schouten, Mirjana Stanic Benic, Ann Versporten and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Quality Indicators for Appropriate Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Adults: A Systematic Review and RAND-modified Delphi Procedure.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marion Le MaréchalUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Gianpiero TebanoUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Annelie A MonnierDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niels AdriaenssensLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Inge C GyssensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Benedikt HuttnerInfection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Romina MilanicDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Rijeka and Medical Faculty, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Jeroen SchoutenScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mirjana Stanic BenicDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Rijeka and Medical Faculty, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Ann VersportenLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vera Vlahovic-PalcevskiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Rijeka and Medical Faculty, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Veronica ZanichelliInfection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marlies E HulscherScientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Céline PulciniUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, F-54000 Nancy, France.
DRIVE-AB WP1 group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Quality indicators (QIs) assessing the appropriateness of antibiotic use are essential to identify targets for improvement and guide antibiotic stewardship interventions. The aim of this study was to develop a set of QIs for the outpatient setting from a global perspective. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed by searching MEDLINE and relevant web sites in order to retrieve a list of QIs. These indicators were extracted from published trials, guidelines, literature reviews or consensus procedures. This evidence-based set of QIs was evaluated by a multidisciplinary, international group of stakeholders using a RAND-modified Delphi procedure, using two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting between them. Stakeholders appraised the QIs' relevance using a nine-point Likert scale. This work is part of the DRIVE-AB project. Results: The systematic literature review identified 43 unique QIs, from 54 studies and seven web sites. Twenty-five stakeholders from 14 countries participated in the consensus procedure. Ultimately, 32 QIs were retained, with a high level of agreement. The set of QIs included structure, process and outcome indicators, targeting both high- and middle- to low-income settings. Most indicators focused on general practice, addressing the common indications for antibiotic use in the community (particularly urinary and respiratory tract infections), and the organization of healthcare facilities. Twelve indicators specifically addressed outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Conclusions: We identified a set of 32 outpatient QIs to measure the appropriateness of antibiotic use. These QIs can be used to identify targets for improvement and to evaluate the effects of antibiotic stewardship interventions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipOutpatientsPublic HealthQuality Indicators, Health CareHumansInternationalityRespiratory Tract InfectionsStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29878218
PMCPMC5989608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.