Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878178›Full record

Observational studyPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2018

Factors Related to Migraine Patients' Decisions to Initiate Behavioral Migraine Treatment Following a Headache Specialist's Recommendation: A Prospective Observational Study.

Mia T Minen, Sarah Azarchi, Rachel Sobolev, Amanda Shallcross, Audrey Halpern, Thomas Berk, Naomi M Simon, Scott Powers, Richard B Lipton, Elizabeth Seng

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mindfulness in migraine: A narrative review.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mia T MinenDepartment of Neurology.
Sarah AzarchiNYU School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Rachel SobolevNYU School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Amanda ShallcrossDepartment of Population Health.
Audrey HalpernDepartment of Neurology.
Thomas BerkDepartment of Neurology.
Naomi M SimonDepartment of Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Scott PowersDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Richard B LiptonDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Elizabeth SengDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

Funding

Clinical Decision Support for Patient Migraine ManagementK23NS096107 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI SENG-TAMACCIO, ELIZABETH K · 2016 to 2020
$965k
Progressive Muscle Relaxation for Chronic Pain in an Acute Care SettingK23AT009706 · NCCIH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MINEN, MIA · 2018 to 2022
$923k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT009706NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS096107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the frequency with which migraine patients initiated behavioral migraine treatment following a headache specialist recommendation and the predictors for initiating behavioral migraine treatment. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients diagnosed with migraine to examine whether the patients initiated behavioral migraine treatment following a provider recommendation. The primary outcome was scheduling the initial visit for behavioral migraine treatment. Patients who initiated behavioral migraine treatment were compared with those who did not (demographics, migraine characteristics, and locus of control) with analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Results: Of the 234 eligible patients, 69 (29.5%) were referred for behavioral treatment. Fifty-three (76.8%) patients referred for behavioral treatment were reached by phone. The mean duration from time of referral to follow-up was 76  (median 76, SD = 45) days. Thirty (56.6%) patients initiated behavioral migraine treatment. There was no difference in initiation of behavioral migraine treatment with regard to sex, age, age of diagnosis, years suffered with headaches, health care utilization visits, Migraine Disability Assessment Screen, and locus of control (P > 0.05). Patients who had previously seen a psychologist for migraine were more likely to initiate behavioral migraine treatment than patients who had not. Time constraints were the most common barrier cited for not initiating behavioral migraine treatment. Conclusions: Less than one-third of eligible patients were referred for behavioral treatment, and only about half initiated behavioral migraine treatment. Future research should further assess patients' decisions regarding behavioral treatment initiation and methods for behavioral treatment delivery to overcome barriers to initiating behavioral migraine treatment.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyTreatment OutcomeAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersProspective StudiesReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID29878178
PMCPMC6454786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.