Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878161›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

Prognostic Role of p16 in Nonoropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer.

Alex K Bryant, Elena J Sojourner, Lucas K Vitzthum, Kaveh Zakeri, Hanjie Shen, Cammie Nguyen, James D Murphy, Joseph A Califano, Ezra E W Cohen, Loren K Mell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Nomogram to Predict the Benefit of Intensive Treatment for Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alex K BryantDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
Elena J SojournerDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
Lucas K VitzthumDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
Kaveh ZakeriDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
Hanjie ShenDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health.
Cammie NguyenMoores Cancer Center.
James D MurphyDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.
Joseph A CalifanoDivision of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery.
Ezra E W CohenDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Loren K MellDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences.

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteTL1TR001443 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEPP, COLIN A. · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have reported conflicting information regarding the prognostic role of p16 in nonoropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods: Using the US Veterans Affairs database, we analyzed 1448 patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC and known p16 status diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 and treated with surgery, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. Tumor p16 status was determined through manual review of pathology reports of primary tumor specimens. Oropharyngeal (n = 1061) or nonoropharyngeal (n = 387; hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, or oral cavity) tumor site was determined from tumor registry data and manually reviewed for accuracy. We used multivariable Cox regression to analyze the effect of p16 status on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and competing mortality (CM) for oropharyngeal or nonoropharyngeal tumor sites. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: In multivariable models adjusting for treatment, stage, age, comorbidity, and body mass index, patients with p16-positive tumors had improved OS, CSS, and CM compared with patients with p16-negative tumors in both oropharyngeal (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40 to 0.71, P < .001; CSS: HR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.73, P < .001; CM: HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.93, P = .02) and nonoropharyngeal primary sites (OS: HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.69, P < .001; CSS: HR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.77, P = .008; CM: HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.95, P = .04). The prognostic impact of p16 status did not statistically significantly differ by primary tumor site for OS, CSS, or CM (Pinteraction > .05). Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that p16 has a similar prognostic role in both nonoropharyngeal and oropharyngeal cancer. Consideration should be given to increased testing for p16 in laryngeal, hypopharyngeal, and oral cavity primaries.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAgedCombined Modality TherapyCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, VeteransHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPopulation SurveillancePrognosisTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16

Identifiers

PMID29878161
PMCPMC6292787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.