Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878140›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2018

The Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (FITS) 2016: Study Design and Methods.

Andrea S Anater, Diane J Catellier, Burton A Levine, Karol P Krotki, Emma F Jacquier, Alison L Eldridge, Katherine E Bronstein, Lisa J Harnack, Julia M Lorenzana Peasley, Anne C Lutes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea S AnaterRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Diane J CatellierRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Burton A LevineRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Karol P KrotkiRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Emma F JacquierNestlé Research Center, Vers-Chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alison L EldridgeNestlé Research Center, Vers-Chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Katherine E BronsteinRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Lisa J HarnackNutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Epidemiology & Community Health, Minneapolis, MN.
Julia M Lorenzana PeasleyNutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Epidemiology & Community Health, Minneapolis, MN.
Anne C LutesRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diet and feeding patterns during the infant, toddler, and preschool years affect nutrient adequacy or excess during critical developmental periods. Understanding food consumption, feeding practices, and nutrient adequacy or excess during these periods is essential to establishing appropriate recommendations aimed at instilling healthy eating behaviors in children. Objective: The objective of the 2016 Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (FITS 2016) was to update our knowledge on the diets and feeding patterns of young children and to provide new data in related areas such as feeding behaviors, sleep, physical activity, and screen use. This article describes the study design, data collection methods, 24-h dietary recall (24-h recall) protocol, and sample characteristics of FITS 2016. Methods: FITS 2016 is a cross-sectional study of caregivers of children aged <4 y living in the 50 states and Washington, DC. Data collection occurred between June 2015 and May 2016. A recruitment interview (respondent and child characteristics, feeding practices, physical activity, screen use, and sleep habits) was completed by telephone or online. This was followed by a feeding practices questionnaire and the 24-h recall conducted by telephone. A second 24-h recall was collected for a random subsample of 25% of the total sampled population. Results: Among the 4830 recruited households with an age-eligible child, 3248 (67%) completed the 24-h recall. The respondents were more likely to be white, less likely to be Hispanic, and more highly educated than the US population of adults in households with a child <4 y of age. The sample was subsequently calibrated and weighted, and the distribution of respondents was compared with known population distributions. Conclusions: FITS 2016 provides data based on sound methods that can inform researchers, policymakers, and practitioners about the food and nutrient intakes of young children. New findings may also be compared with previous FITS studies.

Indexed as

Child HealthDietFeeding BehaviorInfant HealthAdultCaregiversChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiet SurveysDistrict of ColumbiaEducational StatusEthnicityExerciseFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID29878140
PMCPMC6126632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.