Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878066›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Contrasting Semantic versus Inhibitory Processing in the Angular Gyrus: An fMRI Study.

Gwyneth A Lewis, David Poeppel, Gregory L Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The language network is not engaged in object categorization.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gwyneth A LewisDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY, USA.
David PoeppelDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY, USA.
Gregory L MurphyDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Cortical Mechanisms in Speech Perception: MEG StudiesR01DC005660 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI POEPPEL, DAVID E · 2002 to 2018
$7.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of semantic memory have focused on dissociating the neural bases of two foundational components of human thought: taxonomic categories, which group similar objects like dogs and seals based on features, and thematic categories, which group dissimilar objects like dogs and leashes based on events. While there is emerging consensus that taxonomic concepts are represented in the anterior temporal lobe, there is disagreement over whether thematic concepts are represented in the angular gyrus (AG). We previously found AG sensitivity to both kinds of concepts; however, some accounts suggest that such activity reflects inhibition of irrelevant information rather than thematic activation. To test these possibilities, an fMRI experiment investigated both types of conceptual relations in the AG during two semantic judgment tasks. Each task trained participants to give negative responses (inhibition) or positive responses (activation) to word pairs based on taxonomic and thematic criteria of relatedness. Results showed AG engagement during both negative judgments and thematic judgments, but not during positive judgments about taxonomic pairs. Together, the results suggest that activity in the AG reflects functions that include both thematic (but not taxonomic) processing and inhibiting irrelevant semantic information.

Indexed as

SemanticsAdultBrain MappingConcept FormationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryParietal Lobeangular gyrusfMRItaxonomic categories, conceptsthematic relations

Identifiers

PMID29878066
PMCPMC6519692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.