Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878061›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2018

Nutrient enrichment of human milk with human and bovine milk-based fortifiers for infants born weighing <1250 g: a randomized clinical trial.

Deborah L O'Connor, Alex Kiss, Christopher Tomlinson, Nicole Bando, Ann Bayliss, Douglas M Campbell, Alan Daneman, Jane Francis, Kirsten Kotsopoulos, Prakesh S Shah and 4 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02137473 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing Mothers' Milk for Preterm Infants (OptiMoM) Program of Research: Study 2-Bovine vs. Human Milk-Based Fortifier Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2014 to 2016Enrolled127ConditionsVery Low Birth Weight Infant (<1250g)ArmsHuman milk-based fortifier, Bovine protein-based fortifier
NCT06870981 recruitingnot on this map

Improving Growth and Neurodevelopment of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Through Precision Nutrition: The Optimizing Nutrition and Milk (Opti-NuM) Project

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2010 to 2027Enrolled1,100ConditionsVery Low Birth Weight Baby, Early Nutrition and the Preterm Infant, Nutritional Requirements, Human Milk FortificationArmsOpti-NuM is an observational secondary use of data/samples study, the investigators will analyze information and specimens from the MaxiMoM platform RCTs. No interventions form part of this study.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Inflammatory Markers in Mother's Own Milk and Infant Stool of Very Low Birthweight Infants.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2023
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Nutritional confounding and reporting limitations in the JASMINE Trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Deborah L O'ConnorTranslational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology and Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Alex KissInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Christopher TomlinsonTranslational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology and Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Nicole BandoTranslational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology and Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Ann BaylissTrillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada.
Douglas M CampbellTranslational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Alan DanemanTranslational Medicine Program and Divisions of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Jane FrancisTranslational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology and Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Kirsten KotsopoulosDepartment of Pediatrics, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.
Prakesh S ShahDepartments of Pediatrics and Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Simone VazDepartment of Pediatrics, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Canada.
Brock WilliamsTranslational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology and Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Sharon UngerTranslational Medicine Program and Divisions of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
OptiMoM Feeding Group

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Human milk-based fortifiers (HMBFs) are being adopted in neonatal care to enrich the nutrients in human milk for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants despite being costly and there being limited efficacy data. No randomized clinical trial has evaluated the use of HMBF compared with bovine milk-based fortifiers (BMBFs) in the absence of formula feeding. Objective: To determine if HMBF compared with BMBF for routine nutrient enrichment of human milk improves feeding tolerance, reduces morbidity, reduces fecal calprotectin (a measure of gut inflammation), and supports the growth of infants <1250 g. Design: In this blinded randomized clinical trial, infants born weighing <1250 g were recruited from neonatal units in Ontario, Canada between August 2014 and November 2015. The infants were fed mother's milk and donor milk as required. Fortification commenced at 100 mL/kg per day of HMBF (0.81 kcal/mL) or BMBF (0.72 kcal/mL) and advanced at 140 mL/kg per day to 0.88 and 0.78 kcal/mL, respectively. The primary outcome was percentage of infants with a feeding interruption for ≥12 h or a >50% reduction in feeding volume. Secondary outcomes included a dichotomous mortality and morbidity index (i.e., affirmative for any one of death, late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, chronic lung disease, or severe retinopathy of prematurity), fecal calprotectin, and growth. Results: Of 232 eligible infants, 127 (54.7%) were randomized (n = 64 HMBF, n = 63 BMBF). Mean ± SD birth weight and gestational age of infants were 888 ± 201 g and 27.7 ± 2.5 wk, respectively. No statistically significant differences were identified in feeding interruptions [17/64 HMBF, 20/61 BMBF; unadjusted risk difference: -6.2% (95% CI: -22.2%, 9.8%)]. There was no statistically significant difference in the mortality and morbidity index (48.4% HMBF, 49.2% BMBF, adjusted P = 0.76), changes in fecal calprotectin, or growth z scores. Conclusions: Among infants born weighing <1250 g and exclusively fed human milk, the use of HMBF did not improve feeding tolerance or reduce mortality and morbidity compared with BMBF. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02137473.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMilkMilk, HumanAnimalsCattleFemaleHumansInfant FoodInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID29878061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.