Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29878058›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2018

Plasma metabolites and lipids predict insulin sensitivity improvement in obese, nondiabetic individuals after a 2-phase dietary intervention.

Antonin Meyer, Emilie Montastier, Jörg Hager, Wim H M Saris, Arne Astrup, Nathalie Viguerie, Armand Valsesia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00390637 (Diet, Obesity and Genes), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00390637 phase4completednot on this map

Diet, Obesity and Genes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2006 to 2009Enrolled1,020ConditionsObesity, Metabolic Syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes, Cardiovascular DiseaseArmsHigh or low Glycemic Index and high or low Protein Diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Antonin MeyerNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Emilie MontastierInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité 1048, Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Jörg HagerNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Wim H M SarisDepartment of Human Biology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Arne AstrupDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise, and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nathalie ViguerieInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité 1048, Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Armand ValsesiaNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nestlé (Switzerland) · CHInserm · FRMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Weight loss in obese individuals aims to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes by improving glycemic control. Yet, significant intersubject variability is observed and the outcomes remain poorly predictable. Objective: The aim of the study was to predict whether an individual will show improvements in insulin sensitivity above or below the median population change at 6 mo after a low-calorie-diet (LCD) intervention. Design: With the use of plasma lipidomics and metabolomics for 433 subjects from the Diet, Obesity, and Genes (DiOGenes) Study, we attempted to predict good or poor Matsuda index improvements 6 mo after an 8-wk LCD intervention (800 kcal/d). Three independent analysis groups were defined: "training" (n = 119) for model construction, "testing" (n = 162) for model comparison, and "validation" (n = 152) to validate the final model. Results: Initial modeling with baseline clinical variables (body mass index, Matsuda index, total lipid concentrations, sex, age) showed limited performance [area under the curve (AUC) on the "testing dataset" = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.77]. Significantly better performance was achieved with an omics model based on 27 variables (AUC = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.85; P = 0.0297). This model could be greatly simplified while keeping the same performance. The simplified model relied on baseline Matsuda index, proline, and phosphatidylcholine 0-34:1. It successfully replicated on the validation set (AUC = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.83) with the following characteristics: specificity = 0.73, sensitivity = 0.68, negative predictive value = 0.60, and positive predictive value = 0.80. Marginally lower performance was obtained when replacing the Matsuda index with homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.80; P = 0.08). Conclusions: Our study proposes a model to predict insulin sensitivity improvements, 6 mo after LCD completion in a large population of overweight or obese nondiabetic subjects. It relies on baseline information from 3 variables, accessible from blood samples. This model may help clinicians assessing the large variability in dietary interventions and predict outcomes before an intervention. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00390637.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAdultDiet, ReducingEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansLipidsMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalObesityLipids

Identifiers

PMID29878058
PMCPMC6600064
OpenAlexW2807111369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.