Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29877593›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2018

A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development.

T Niemeyer-van der Kolk, H E C van der Wall, C Balmforth, M B A Van Doorn, R Rissmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Gut Microbiota-Related Antihyperglycemic Effect of Metformin.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [The skin microbiome-useful for diagnosis and therapy?]Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [New developments in topical pharmaceuticals].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Xenobiotic Receptors and Their Mates in Atopic Dermatitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T Niemeyer-van der KolkCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3221-1609
H E C van der WallCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
C BalmforthCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
M B A Van DoornCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
R RissmannCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5867-9090
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore the potential of the skin microbiome as biomarker in six dermatological conditions: atopic dermatitis (AD), acne vulgaris (AV), psoriasis vulgaris (PV), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), seborrhoeic dermatitis/pityriasis capitis (SD/PC) and ulcus cruris (UC).

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently reviewed the included studies and ranked the suitability microbiome implementation for early phase clinical studies in an adapted GRADE method.

resultsIn total, 841 papers were identified and after screening of titles and abstracts for eligibility we identified 42 manuscripts that could be included in the review. Eleven studies were included for AD, five for AV, 10 for PV, two for HS, four for SD and 10 for UC. For AD and AV, multiple studies report the relationship between the skin microbiome, disease severity and clinical response to treatment. This is currently lacking for the remaining conditions.

conclusionFor two indications - AD and AV - there is preliminary evidence to support implementation of the skin microbiome as biomarkers in early phase clinical trials. For PV, UC, SD and HS there is insufficient evidence from the literature. More microbiome-directed prospective studies studying the effect of current treatments on the microbiome with special attention for patient meta-data, sampling methods and analysis methods are needed to draw more substantial conclusions.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicDermatologic AgentsDrug DevelopmentHumansSkinSkin DiseasesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersDermatologic Agentsbiomarkersclinical drug developmentmicrobiotasurrogate parameter

Identifiers

PMID29877593
PMCPMC6138488
OpenAlexW2805591135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.