Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876832›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Designing for impact: identifying stakeholder-driven interventions to support recovery after major cancer surgery.

Carmit McMullen, Matthew Nielsen, Alison Firemark, Patricia Merino Price, Denise Nakatani, Jean Tuthill, Ruth McMyn, Anobel Odisho, Michael Meyers, David Shibata and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A qualitative evaluation of a nurse-led pre-operative stoma education program for bladder cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carmit McMullenCenter for Health Research - Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA. Carmit.McMullen@kp.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-6591
Matthew NielsenSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alison FiremarkCenter for Health Research - Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Patricia Merino PriceIDEO, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Denise NakataniKaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Jean TuthillKaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Ruth McMynKaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Anobel OdishoDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michael MeyersSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
David ShibataDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Scott GilbertMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

Urinary Diversion Among Bladder Cancer Survivors: Cost, Complications, and QOLR01CA164128 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCMULLEN, CARMIT KURN · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
National Cancer Institute R01 CA164128NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComplex bladder and colorectal cancer surgeries are associated with significant patient morbidity, yet few resources exist to prepare patients for the high levels of distress and complications they may experience. After ethnographic research to identify design challenges, we held a user-centered design (UCD) workshop to begin to develop patient- and caregiver-centered interventions to support preparation for and recovery after complex cancer surgery.

methodsConcepts that emerged from brainstorming sessions were visually represented on storyboards and rated. Highly scored concepts were further developed in break-out prototyping sessions and then presented to the entire group for review in person and during subsequent webinars. We collected workshop products (worksheets, prototypes, and recordings) for analysis to identify opportunities for intervention. The workshop, held in late 2014, was attended by three colorectal/oncologic surgeons, three urologic surgeons, five ostomy nurses, one quality improvement leader, three patients, one caregiver, and three experienced UCD facilitators.

resultsThree opportunity areas were identified: (1) enhanced patient education including tele-health and multi-media tools (available at hospitals/clinics or online in any setting), (2) personalized discharge assessment and care planning, and (3) integrated symptom monitoring and educational interventions. Stakeholders reached consensus that enhanced patient education was the most important direction for subsequent intervention development.

conclusionsWe engaged diverse stakeholders in a participatory, UCD process and concluded that research and practice improvement should prioritize the development of educational interventions in the pre-operative period to set the groundwork for improving appropriate self-care during recovery from major colorectal and bladder cancer surgeries.

Indexed as

Patient DischargeCaregiversColorectal NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Education as TopicRehabilitationSelf CareStakeholder ParticipationUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBladder cancer surgeryColorectal cancer surgeryOstomySelf-careUrinary diversionUser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID29876832
PMCPMC6682403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.