Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29876703›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2018

Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound updated in 2017 by European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus.

Luca Maria Sconfienza, Domenico Albano, Georgina Allen, Alberto Bazzocchi, Bianca Bignotti, Vito Chianca, Fernando Facal de Castro, Elena E Drakonaki, Elena Gallardo, Jan Gielen and 17 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Accuracy of Key Sonographic Markers for Juxta-Articular Fractures: A Prospective Study Using Explainable Machine Learning.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Ultrasonography in Canine Carpal Disorders.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Luca Maria SconfienzaUnità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milano, Italy. io@lucasconfienza.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0759-8431
Domenico AlbanoDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Georgina AllenDepartment of Radiology, St Lukes Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Alberto BazzocchiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, "Rizzoli" Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Bianca BignottiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Via Pastore 1, 16132, Genova, Italy.
Vito ChiancaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Università degli studi Federico II, via Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy.
Fernando Facal de CastroHospital General Universitario de Valencia, Ave. Tres Cruces 2, 46014, Valencia, Spain.
Elena E DrakonakiIndependent MSK radiology practice, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Elena GallardoDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Jan GielenRadiology and S.P.O.R.T.S. Department, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium.
Andrea Sabine KlauserDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Section Rheumatology and Sports Imaging, Innsbruck, Austria.
Carlo MartinoliDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Via Pastore 1, 16132, Genova, Italy.
Giovanni MauriDivision of Interventional Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milano, Italy.
Eugene McNallyOxford Musculoskeletal Radiology, Oxford, UK.
Carmelo MessinaUnità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milano, Italy.
Rebeca Mirón MombielaHospital General Universitario de Valencia, Ave. Tres Cruces 2, 46014, Valencia, Spain.
Davide OrlandiS.C. Diagnostica per Immagini e Ecografia Interventistica, Ospedale Evangelico Internazionale, Corso Solferino 1A, 16122, Genova, Italy.
Athena PlagouDepartment of Radiology, Private Institution of Ultrasonography, Athens, Greece.
Magdalena PosadzyDepartment of Radiology, W. Dega Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation University Hospital of Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Rosa de la PuenteHospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Monique ReijnierseDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Federica RossiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Via Pastore 1, 16132, Genova, Italy.
Saulius RutkauskasInstitute of Sport Science and Innovation, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Ziga SnojLjubljana University Medical Centre, Clinical Institute of Radiology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jelena VuceticHospital General Universitario de Valencia, Ave. Tres Cruces 2, 46014, Valencia, Spain.
David WilsonDepartment of Radiology, St Lukes Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Alberto Stefano TagliaficoDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Via Pastore 1, 16132, Genova, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITSt Lukes Hospital · GBUniversitat de València · ESUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAntwerp University Hospital · BECentre for Technological Research of Crete · GRHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ESInnsbruck Medical University · ATIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITLeiden University Medical Center · NLLithuanian Sports University · LTLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESNIHR Oxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre · GBPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLRipamonti · ITUniversidad de Cantabria · ESUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo update the 2012 European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) clinical consensus guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound referral in Europe.

methodsTwenty-one musculoskeletal imaging experts from the ESSR participated in a consensus study based on a Delphic process. Two independent (non-voting) authors facilitated the procedure and resolved doubtful issues. Updated musculoskeletal ultrasound literature up to July 2017 was scored for shoulder, elbow, wrist/hand, hip, knee, and ankle/foot. Scoring of ultrasound elastography was included. The strength of the recommendation and level of evidence was scored by consensus greater than 67% or considered uncertain when the consensus was consensus less than 67%.

resultsA total of 123 new papers were reviewed. No evidence change was found regarding the shoulder. There were no new relevant articles for the shoulder, 10 new articles for the elbow, 28 for the hand/wrist, 3 for the hip, 7 for the knee, and 4 for the ankle/foot. Four new evidence levels of A were determined, one for the hip (gluteal tendons tears), one for the knee (meniscal cysts), one for the ankle (ankle joint instability), and one for the foot (plantar plate tear). There was no level A evidence for elastography, although for Achilles tendinopathy and lateral epicondylitis evidence level was B with grade 3 indication.

conclusionsFour new areas of level A evidence were included in the guidelines. Elastography did not reach level A evidence. Whilst ultrasound is of increasing importance in musculoskeletal medical practice, the evidence for elastography remains moderate. KEY POINTS: • Evidence and expert consensus shows an increase of musculoskeletal ultrasound indications. • Four new A evidence levels were found for the hip, knee, ankle, and foot. • There was no level A evidence for elastography.

Indexed as

RadiologySocieties, MedicalEuropeHumansMusculoskeletal DiseasesUltrasonographyDelphi techniqueElasticity imaging techniquesGuidelineMusculoskeletal systemUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID29876703
OpenAlexW2807566117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.